Re: RFR: 8348909: [BACKOUT] Implement a better allocator for downcalls

2025-01-31 Thread Chen Liang
On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 15:01:08 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote: > This reverts https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23142 > > See the JBS issue. It seems that the changes are occasionally causing heap > corruption, potentially due to use after free, which occasionally results in > corrupt malloc headers b

Re: RFR: 8348909: [BACKOUT] Implement a better allocator for downcalls

2025-01-31 Thread Jorn Vernee
On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 15:54:01 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: > Backout looks fine. Looks like the clean mechanical `git revert`, and > therefore trivial. Yes, it's a clean `git revert` - PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23391#issuecomment-2627694000

Re: RFR: 8348909: [BACKOUT] Implement a better allocator for downcalls

2025-01-31 Thread Aleksey Shipilev
On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 15:01:08 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote: > This reverts https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23142 > > See the JBS issue. It seems that the changes are occasionally causing heap > corruption, potentially due to use after free, which occasionally results in > corrupt malloc headers b

RFR: 8348909: [BACKOUT] Implement a better allocator for downcalls

2025-01-31 Thread Jorn Vernee
This reverts https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23142 See the JBS issue. It seems that the changes are occasionally causing heap corruption, potentially due to use after free, which occasionally results in corrupt malloc headers being caught on mac. This failure was observed once in about 500