On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 07:30:22 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> Testing is still clean on my side. I would appreciate if folks can run this
>>> through their CIs.
>>>
>>> I am planning to integrate this on Monday, as long as we discover no new
>>> issues.
>>
>> Did the change to
>> `test/jdk/sun/s
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 19:42:49 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/ref/Reference.java line 282:
>>
>>> 280: * This method returns a strong reference to the referent. This
>>> may cause
>>> 281: * the garbage collector to treat it as strongly reachable u
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:58:07 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> > > Would you mind holding off until Tuesday to give time to get that done?
> >
> >
> > Sure, there is no rush with this PR. I'll wait.
>
> How is it going, @AlanBateman? Any progress on closed tests?
Nearly done - in review now.
--
On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 09:08:56 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> > Would you mind holding off until Tuesday to give time to get that done?
>
> Sure, there is no rush with this PR. I'll wait.
How is it going, @AlanBateman? Any progress on closed tests?
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.
On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 07:30:22 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> Would you mind holding off until Tuesday to give time to get that done?
Sure, there is no rush with this PR. I'll wait.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22165#issuecomment-2615197062
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 22:01:59 GMT, Brent Christian wrote:
> Testing is still clean on my side. I would appreciate if folks can run this
> through their CIs.
>
> I am planning to integrate this on Monday, as long as we discover no new
> issues.
I ran it through our CI and we seem to have a few
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 22:01:59 GMT, Brent Christian wrote:
> Did the change to
> `test/jdk/sun/security/provider/FileInputStreamPool/FileInputStreamPoolTest.java`
> get lost? I'm pretty sure it was updated, but I no longer see that in the
> changes, and it failed in my automated test run.
It wa
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 11:30:16 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Testing is still clean on my side. I would appreciate if folks can run this
> through their CIs.
>
> I am planning to integrate this on Monday, as long as we discover no new
> issues.
Did the change to
`test/jdk/sun/security/provide
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 08:51:38 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> DirectByteBuffers are still using old `jdk.internal.ref.Cleaner`
>> implementation. That implementation carries a doubly-linked list, and so
>> makes DBB suffer from the same issue fixed for generic
>> `java.lang.ref.Cleaner` users w
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 00:09:00 GMT, Brent Christian wrote:
>> Aleksey Shipilev has updated the pull request incrementally with three
>> additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - No instantiation for BufferCleaner, javadocs
>> - Remove hasReferencePendingList
>> - Revert test exclusio
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 08:51:38 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> DirectByteBuffers are still using old `jdk.internal.ref.Cleaner`
>> implementation. That implementation carries a doubly-linked list, and so
>> makes DBB suffer from the same issue fixed for generic
>> `java.lang.ref.Cleaner` users w
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 08:51:38 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> DirectByteBuffers are still using old `jdk.internal.ref.Cleaner`
>> implementation. That implementation carries a doubly-linked list, and so
>> makes DBB suffer from the same issue fixed for generic
>> `java.lang.ref.Cleaner` users w
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 08:51:38 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> DirectByteBuffers are still using old `jdk.internal.ref.Cleaner`
>> implementation. That implementation carries a doubly-linked list, and so
>> makes DBB suffer from the same issue fixed for generic
>> `java.lang.ref.Cleaner` users w
> DirectByteBuffers are still using old `jdk.internal.ref.Cleaner`
> implementation. That implementation carries a doubly-linked list, and so
> makes DBB suffer from the same issue fixed for generic
> `java.lang.ref.Cleaner` users with
> [JDK-8343704](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8343704
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:35:49 GMT, Brent Christian wrote:
>> Aleksey Shipilev has updated the pull request incrementally with three
>> additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - No instantiation for BufferCleaner, javadocs
>> - Remove hasReferencePendingList
>> - Revert test exclusio
15 matches
Mail list logo
