On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 23:38:31 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> Please review the backport of #20145 onto jdk23, fixing 2 unnecessary and
> erroneous links in the doc files.
Marked as reviewed by prappo (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20166#pullrequestreview-217806
On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 23:38:31 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> Please review the backport of #20145 onto jdk23, fixing 2 unnecessary and
> erroneous links in the doc files.
Thanks for the reviews!
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20166#issuecomment-2228806864
On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 23:38:31 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> Please review the backport of #20145 onto jdk23, fixing 2 unnecessary and
> erroneous links in the doc files.
Confirmed identical to original PR.
-
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/
Please review the backport of #20145 onto jdk23, fixing 2 unnecessary and
erroneous links in the doc files.
-
Commit messages:
- Backport 5bc86f332986e3fffc1363f569029bb73a706064
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20166/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&p
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 20:55:29 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
> Can I please get a review for this small change, the relative link to the
> stylesheet isn't needed as it wasn't used anyway in the generated HTML. The
> correct link to the stylesheet is already in the generated HTML.
>
> This is the di
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 20:55:29 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
> Can I please get a review for this small change, the relative link to the
> stylesheet isn't needed as it wasn't used anyway in the generated HTML. The
> correct link to the stylesheet is already in the generated HTML.
>
> This is the di
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 20:55:29 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
> Can I please get a review for this small change, the relative link to the
> stylesheet isn't needed as it wasn't used anyway in the generated HTML. The
> correct link to the stylesheet is already in the generated HTML.
>
> This is the di
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 20:55:29 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
> Can I please get a review for this small change, the relative link to the
> stylesheet isn't needed as it wasn't used anyway in the generated HTML. The
> correct link to the stylesheet is already in the generated HTML.
>
> This is the di
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 20:55:29 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
> Can I please get a review for this small change, the relative link to the
> stylesheet isn't needed as it wasn't used anyway in the generated HTML. The
> correct link to the stylesheet is already in the generated HTML.
>
> This is the di
Can I please get a review for this small change, the relative link to the
stylesheet isn't needed as it wasn't used anyway in the generated HTML. The
correct link to the stylesheet is already in the generated HTML.
This is the difference between the generated docs before and after this change,
10 matches
Mail list logo
