> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
> performance is not good enough.
>
> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter capabilities. The performance is
> good enough that it is
On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 14:04:52 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
>> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
>> performance is not good enough.
>>
>> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter
On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 14:04:52 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
>> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
>> performance is not good enough.
>>
>> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter
On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 14:04:52 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
>> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
>> performance is not good enough.
>>
>> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter
> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
> performance is not good enough.
>
> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter capabilities. The performance is
> good enough that it is
On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:17:50 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
>> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
>> performance is not good enough.
>>
>> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter
On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:17:50 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
>> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
>> performance is not good enough.
>>
>> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter
On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 16:28:09 GMT, ExE Boss wrote:
>> j.u.Formatter supports args == null
>
> When `args == null` or `args.length == 0`, then the format string can still
> contain `%%` or `%n`, and those will be formatted to `"%"` and
> [`System.lineSeparator()`] respectively.
>
> [`System.lin
> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
> performance is not good enough.
>
> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter capabilities. The performance is
> good enough that it is
On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 19:10:51 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StringFormat.java line 48:
>>
>>> 46: static String format(String format, Object... args) {
>>> 47: if (args != null) {
>>> 48: int off = format.indexOf('%');
>>
>> nit: instead
> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
> performance is not good enough.
>
> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter capabilities. The performance is
> good enough that it is
On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 12:53:42 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
>> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
>> performance is not good enough.
>>
>> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter
> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
> performance is not good enough.
>
> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter capabilities. The performance is
> good enough that it is
On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 06:18:55 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> code style
>
> As promising as the performance number is, I think we need to ensure two
> things:
> 1. Correctness: this p
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 18:21:52 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
>> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
>> performance is not good enough.
>>
>> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatte
> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
> performance is not good enough.
>
> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter capabilities. The performance is
> good enough that it is
> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
> performance is not good enough.
>
> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter capabilities. The performance is
> good enough that it is
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 04:54:35 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
>> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
>> performance is not good enough.
>>
>> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatte
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 14:57:26 GMT, David Schlosnagle wrote:
>> Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> laze init for `decimal fast path locale`
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StringFormat.java line 142:
>
>
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 04:54:35 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
>> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
>> performance is not good enough.
>>
>> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatte
> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
> performance is not good enough.
>
> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter capabilities. The performance is
> good enough that it is
> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
> performance is not good enough.
>
> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter capabilities. The performance is
> good enough that it is
On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 19:05:18 GMT, David Schlosnagle wrote:
>> Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> private method & field
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StringFormat.java line 48:
>
>> 46: static St
On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 18:59:33 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
>> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
>> performance is not good enough.
>>
>> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatte
> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
> performance is not good enough.
>
> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter capabilities. The performance is
> good enough that it is
On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 17:41:47 GMT, David Schlosnagle wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StringFormat.java line 82:
>>
>>> 80: conv = format.charAt(off + 2);
>>> 81: }
>>> 82: }
>>
>> is it worth handling `width > 9`?
>>
>> Suggestion:
>>
>>
> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
> performance is not good enough.
>
> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter capabilities. The performance is
> good enough that it is
On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 16:16:51 GMT, David Schlosnagle wrote:
>> Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> rename `digit` to `width`
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StringFormat.java line 82:
>
>> 80:
> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
> performance is not good enough.
>
> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter capabilities. The performance is
> good enough that it is
On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 16:17:32 GMT, David Schlosnagle wrote:
>> Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request incrementally with four additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Update src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StringFormat.java
>>
>>Co-authored-by: David Schlosnagle
>
> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
> performance is not good enough.
>
> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter capabilities. The performance is
> good enough that it is
On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 11:53:31 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
> performance is not good enough.
>
> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter cap
On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 11:53:31 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
> performance is not good enough.
>
> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter cap
We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was
once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its
performance is not good enough.
This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter capabilities. The performance is
good enough that it is a fastpath
34 matches
Mail list logo
