On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 16:00:10 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> [8318446](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16245) brings MergeStore. We
>> need a JMH Benchmark to evaluate the performance of various batch operations
>> and the effect of MergeStore.
>
> Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request with
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 21:59:52 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 16 additional
>> commits sin
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 16:00:10 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> [8318446](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16245) brings MergeStore. We
>> need a JMH Benchmark to evaluate the performance of various batch operations
>> and the effect of MergeStore.
>
> Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request with
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 16:00:10 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> [8318446](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16245) brings MergeStore. We
>> need a JMH Benchmark to evaluate the performance of various batch operations
>> and the effect of MergeStore.
>
> Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request with
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 16:00:10 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> [8318446](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16245) brings MergeStore. We
>> need a JMH Benchmark to evaluate the performance of various batch operations
>> and the effect of MergeStore.
>
> Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request with
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 16:00:10 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> [8318446](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16245) brings MergeStore. We
>> need a JMH Benchmark to evaluate the performance of various batch operations
>> and the effect of MergeStore.
>
> Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request with
> [8318446](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16245) brings MergeStore. We
> need a JMH Benchmark to evaluate the performance of various batch operations
> and the effect of MergeStore.
Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
or a rebase. The incrementa
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:33:43 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 14 additional
>> commits sinc
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 01:09:49 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 13 additional
>> commits sin
On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:52:17 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> [8318446](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16245) brings MergeStore. We
>> need a JMH Benchmark to evaluate the performance of various batch operations
>> and the effect of MergeStore.
>
> Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request with
> [8318446](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16245) brings MergeStore. We
> need a JMH Benchmark to evaluate the performance of various batch operations
> and the effect of MergeStore.
Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
or a rebase. The incrementa
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 23:02:47 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> [8318446](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16245) brings MergeStore. We
>> need a JMH Benchmark to evaluate the performance of various batch operations
>> and the effect of MergeStore.
>
> Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request with
> [8318446](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16245) brings MergeStore. We
> need a JMH Benchmark to evaluate the performance of various batch operations
> and the effect of MergeStore.
Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
or a rebase. The incrementa
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 08:07:40 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/java/lang/MergeStoreBench.java line 656:
>>
>>> 654: array[offset + 2] = (byte) (value >> 8);
>>> 655: array[offset + 3] = (byte) (value );
>>> 656: }
>>
>> You say that here `MergeSto
> [8318446](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16245) brings MergeStore. We
> need a JMH Benchmark to evaluate the performance of various batch operations
> and the effect of MergeStore.
Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
> [8318446](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16245) brings MergeStore. We
> need a JMH Benchmark to evaluate the performance of various batch operations
> and the effect of MergeStore.
Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
> [8318446](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16245) brings MergeStore. We
> need a JMH Benchmark to evaluate the performance of various batch operations
> and the effect of MergeStore.
Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request incrementally with four additional
commits since the last revisio
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 07:44:33 GMT, Emanuel Peter wrote:
>> [8318446](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16245) brings MergeStore. We
>> need a JMH Benchmark to evaluate the performance of various batch operations
>> and the effect of MergeStore.
>
> test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/java/lang/Merge
On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 07:17:16 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
> [8318446](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16245) brings MergeStore. We
> need a JMH Benchmark to evaluate the performance of various batch operations
> and the effect of MergeStore.
A few extra comments:
There is already a `MergeStore
[8318446](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16245) brings MergeStore. We
need a JMH Benchmark to evaluate the performance of various batch operations
and the effect of MergeStore.
-
Commit messages:
- code format
- add `setIntRL` & `setIntRLU`
- add comments
- add comments
-
On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 07:17:16 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
> [8318446](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16245) brings MergeStore. We
> need a JMH Benchmark to evaluate the performance of various batch operations
> and the effect of MergeStore.
# 1. Cases MergeStore does not work
>From the resul
21 matches
Mail list logo