On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 16:24:49 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
>> Can I please get a review for this small change? The motivation is that
>> javac does not recognize `package.html` files.
>>
>> The conversion was simple, I used a script to rename the files, append "*"
>> on the left and remove some HTM
On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 16:24:49 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
>> Can I please get a review for this small change? The motivation is that
>> javac does not recognize `package.html` files.
>>
>> The conversion was simple, I used a script to rename the files, append "*"
>> on the left and remove some HTM
On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 16:24:49 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
>> Can I please get a review for this small change? The motivation is that
>> javac does not recognize `package.html` files.
>>
>> The conversion was simple, I used a script to rename the files, append "*"
>> on the left and remove some HTM
On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 15:09:49 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
>> Nizar Benalla has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Improve package description based on Efimov's suggestion
>
> src/java.naming/share/classes/javax/naming/event/packag
> Can I please get a review for this small change? The motivation is that javac
> does not recognize `package.html` files.
>
> The conversion was simple, I used a script to rename the files, append "*" on
> the left and remove some HTML tags like `` and ``. I did the
> conversion in place, rena
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:44:05 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
>> Can I please get a review for this small change? The motivation is that
>> javac does not recognize `package.html` files.
>>
>> The conversion was simple, I used a script to rename the files, append "*"
>> on the left and remove some HT
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 10:27:03 GMT, Aleksei Efimov wrote:
>> Nizar Benalla has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional
>> comm
> Can I please get a review for this small change? The motivation is that javac
> does not recognize `package.html` files.
>
> The conversion was simple, I used a script to rename the files, append "*" on
> the left and remove some HTML tags like `` and ``. I did the
> conversion in place, rena
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 20:41:56 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> src/java.naming/share/classes/javax/naming/ldap/package-info.java line 200:
>>
>>> 198: * if (respCtls != null) {
>>> 199: * // Find the one we want
>>> 200: * for (int i = 0; i < respCtls.length; i++) {
>>
>> This is the o
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 18:11:45 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
>> Can I please get a review for this small change? The motivation is that
>> javac does not recognize `package.html` files.
>>
>> The conversion was simple, I used a script to rename the files, append "*"
>> on the left and remove some HT
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 18:08:21 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
>> Nizar Benalla has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional
>> commi
> Can I please get a review for this small change? The motivation is that javac
> does not recognize `package.html` files.
>
> The conversion was simple, I used a script to rename the files, append "*" on
> the left and remove some HTML tags like `` and ``. I did the
> conversion in place, rena
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 18:09:10 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
>> Can I please get a review for this small change? The motivation is that
>> javac does not recognize `package.html` files.
>>
>> The conversion was simple, I used a script to rename the files, append "*"
>> on the left and remove some HT
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 17:26:52 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
> Can I please get a review for this small change? The motivation is that javac
> does not recognize `package.html` files.
>
> The conversion was simple, I used a script to rename the files, append "*" on
> the left and remove some HTML tag
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 17:26:52 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
> Can I please get a review for this small change? The motivation is that javac
> does not recognize `package.html` files.
>
> The conversion was simple, I used a script to rename the files, append "*" on
> the left and remove some HTML tag
Can I please get a review for this small change? The motivation is that javac
does not recognize `package.html` files.
The conversion was simple, I used a script to rename the files, append "*" on
the left and remove some HTML tags like and . I did the conversion
in place, renaming them in git
16 matches
Mail list logo
