Re: RFR: 8331207: Misleading example in DateFormat#parse docs [v2]

2024-04-26 Thread Naoto Sato
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:15:12 GMT, Justin Lu wrote: >> Correct a misleading example in the DateFormat parse documentation. >> >> Common usage is to use a factory instance. The original example provided >> assumes a pattern provided by a COMPAT factory instance. >> >> The pattern itself should

Re: RFR: 8331207: Misleading example in DateFormat#parse docs [v2]

2024-04-26 Thread Justin Lu
> Correct a misleading example in the DateFormat parse documentation. > > Common usage is to use a factory instance. The original example provided > assumes a pattern provided by a COMPAT factory instance. The pattern itself > should be explicitly provided. This is chosen over using a CLDR patt

RFR: 8331207: Misleading example in DateFormat#parse docs

2024-04-26 Thread Justin Lu
Correct a misleading example in the DateFormat parse documentation. Common usage is to use a factory instance. The original example provided assumes a pattern provided by a COMPAT factory instance, and does not work with a CLDR instance. The example should be updated to use a pattern provided