On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 07:51:28 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> In the hashN usages of readCen from zip_util.c we see a lot of signed integer
> overflows.
> For example in the java/util jtreg tests those are easily reproducable when
> compiling with -ftrapv (clang/gcc toolchains).
> While those ove
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 07:51:28 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> In the hashN usages of readCen from zip_util.c we see a lot of signed integer
> overflows.
> For example in the java/util jtreg tests those are easily reproducable when
> compiling with -ftrapv (clang/gcc toolchains).
> While those ove
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 07:51:28 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> In the hashN usages of readCen from zip_util.c we see a lot of signed integer
> overflows.
> For example in the java/util jtreg tests those are easily reproducable when
> compiling with -ftrapv (clang/gcc toolchains).
> While those ove
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 07:51:28 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> In the hashN usages of readCen from zip_util.c we see a lot of signed integer
> overflows.
> For example in the java/util jtreg tests those are easily reproducable when
> compiling with -ftrapv (clang/gcc toolchains).
> While those ove
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 07:51:28 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> In the hashN usages of readCen from zip_util.c we see a lot of signed integer
> overflows.
> For example in the java/util jtreg tests those are easily reproducable when
> compiling with -ftrapv (clang/gcc toolchains).
> While those ove
In the hashN usages of readCen from zip_util.c we see a lot of signed integer
overflows.
For example in the java/util jtreg tests those are easily reproducable when
compiling with -ftrapv (clang/gcc toolchains).
While those overflows never seem to cause crashes or similar errors, they are
unwant
