On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:57:46 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Proposing adding getter methods for `locale` and `patterns` fields in the
> `ListFormat` instances. Those fields are used for `equals()`, but without the
> public getter methods, users cannot tell the reasoning of the equality of two
> inst
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:57:46 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Proposing adding getter methods for `locale` and `patterns` fields in the
> `ListFormat` instances. Those fields are used for `equals()`, but without the
> public getter methods, users cannot tell the reasoning of the equality of two
> inst
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:57:46 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Proposing adding getter methods for `locale` and `patterns` fields in the
> `ListFormat` instances. Those fields are used for `equals()`, but without the
> public getter methods, users cannot tell the reasoning of the equality of two
> inst
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:57:46 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Proposing adding getter methods for `locale` and `patterns` fields in the
> `ListFormat` instances. Those fields are used for `equals()`, but without the
> public getter methods, users cannot tell the reasoning of the equality of two
> inst
Proposing adding getter methods for `locale` and `patterns` fields in the
`ListFormat` instances. Those fields are used for `equals()`, but without the
public getter methods, users cannot tell the reasoning of the equality of two
instances. A corresponding CSR has also been drafted.
---
