On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 00:50:18 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> Currently, about 25% of the time spent by the Integer.parseInt and
>> Long.parseLong methods is spent on the Character.digit method.
>>
>> The Character.digit method is common to all radixes. We can use a digit
>> method optimized for Lat
On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 00:50:18 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> Currently, about 25% of the time spent by the Integer.parseInt and
>> Long.parseLong methods is spent on the Character.digit method.
>>
>> The Character.digit method is common to all radixes. We can use a digit
>> method optimized for Lat
On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 00:50:18 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> Currently, about 25% of the time spent by the Integer.parseInt and
>> Long.parseLong methods is spent on the Character.digit method.
>>
>> The Character.digit method is common to all radixes. We can use a digit
>> method optimized for Lat
On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 00:50:18 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> Currently, about 25% of the time spent by the Integer.parseInt and
>> Long.parseLong methods is spent on the Character.digit method.
>>
>> The Character.digit method is common to all radixes. We can use a digit
>> method optimized for Lat
> Currently, about 25% of the time spent by the Integer.parseInt and
> Long.parseLong methods is spent on the Character.digit method.
>
> The Character.digit method is common to all radixes. We can use a digit
> method optimized for Latin1 encoding radix 10 to improve the performance of
> Integ
> By extracting the code that creates the exception, the CodeSize of these
> methods is less than the default FreqInlineSize 325. and for the scenario
> where the most commonly used radix is not specified and the String coder is
> LATIN1, fast-path can improves the performance 10% of
> parseIn
