On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 14:42:07 GMT, 温绍锦 wrote:
>> [PR 14578 ](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14578) still has unresolved
>> discussions, continue to make improvements.
>>
>> # Benchmark Result
>>
>>
>> sh make/devkit/createJMHBundle.sh
>> bash configure --with-jmh=build/jmh/jars
>> make tes
> [PR 14578 ](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14578) still has unresolved
> discussions, continue to make improvements.
>
> # Benchmark Result
>
>
> sh make/devkit/createJMHBundle.sh
> bash configure --with-jmh=build/jmh/jars
> make test TEST="micro:java.util.UUIDBench.toString"
>
>
> ##
> [PR 14578 ](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14578) still has unresolved
> discussions, continue to make improvements.
>
> # Benchmark Result
>
>
> sh make/devkit/createJMHBundle.sh
> bash configure --with-jmh=build/jmh/jars
> make test TEST="micro:java.util.UUIDBench.toString"
>
>
> ##
> [PR 14578 ](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14578) still has unresolved
> discussions, continue to make improvements.
>
> # Benchmark Result
>
>
> sh make/devkit/createJMHBundle.sh
> bash configure --with-jmh=build/jmh/jars
> make test TEST="micro:java.util.UUIDBench.toString"
>
>
> ##
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 03:22:06 GMT, 温绍锦 wrote:
>> [PR 14578 ](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14578) still has unresolved
>> discussions, continue to make improvements.
>>
>> # Benchmark Result
>>
>>
>> sh make/devkit/createJMHBundle.sh
>> bash configure --with-jmh=build/jmh/jars
>> make tes
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 03:06:31 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> 
>>
>> it's enabled
>
>> > @wenshao I have made my suggestions into a patch for you:
>> > [wenshao#1](https://github.com/wenshao/jdk/pull/1) Feel fre
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 03:06:31 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> 
>>
>> it's enabled
>
>> > @wenshao I have made my suggestions into a patch for you:
>> > [wenshao#1](https://github.com/wenshao/jdk/pull/1) Feel fre
> [PR 14578 ](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14578) still has unresolved
> discussions, continue to make improvements.
>
> # Benchmark Result
>
>
> sh make/devkit/createJMHBundle.sh
> bash configure --with-jmh=build/jmh/jars
> make test TEST="micro:java.util.UUIDBench.toString"
>
>
> ##
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 03:06:31 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> 
>>
>> it's enabled
>
>> > @wenshao I have made my suggestions into a patch for you:
>> > [wenshao#1](https://github.com/wenshao/jdk/pull/1) Feel fre
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 02:40:22 GMT, 温绍锦 wrote:
>> [PR 14578 ](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14578) still has unresolved
>> discussions, continue to make improvements.
>>
>> # Benchmark Result
>>
>>
>> sh make/devkit/createJMHBundle.sh
>> bash configure --with-jmh=build/jmh/jars
>> make tes
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 02:40:22 GMT, 温绍锦 wrote:
>> [PR 14578 ](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14578) still has unresolved
>> discussions, continue to make improvements.
>>
>> # Benchmark Result
>>
>>
>> sh make/devkit/createJMHBundle.sh
>> bash configure --with-jmh=build/jmh/jars
>> make tes
> [PR 14578 ](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14578) still has unresolved
> discussions, continue to make improvements.
>
> # Benchmark Result
>
>
> sh make/devkit/createJMHBundle.sh
> bash configure --with-jmh=build/jmh/jars
> make test TEST="micro:java.util.UUIDBench.toString"
>
>
> ##
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 02:40:22 GMT, 温绍锦 wrote:
>> [PR 14578 ](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14578) still has unresolved
>> discussions, continue to make improvements.
>>
>> # Benchmark Result
>>
>>
>> sh make/devkit/createJMHBundle.sh
>> bash configure --with-jmh=build/jmh/jars
>> make tes
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 01:44:15 GMT, 温绍锦 wrote:
> [PR 14578 ](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14578) still has unresolved
> discussions, continue to make improvements.
>
> # Benchmark Result
>
>
> sh make/devkit/createJMHBundle.sh
> bash configure --with-jmh=build/jmh/jars
> make test TEST="m
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 02:33:11 GMT, 温绍锦 wrote:
> > Is using `Unsafe` directly consistently faster than using ByteArray? It
> > should have similar performance as ByteArray's VarHandle is simply a
> > wrapper around Unsafe's put/get methods.
>
> Using Unsafe on aliyun_ecs_c8i.xlarge and MacBookPro
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 02:09:36 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> Is using `Unsafe` directly consistently faster than using ByteArray? It
> should have similar performance as ByteArray's VarHandle is simply a wrapper
> around Unsafe's put/get methods.
Using Unsafe on aliyun_ecs_c8i.xlarge and MacBookPro M1
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 01:44:15 GMT, 温绍锦 wrote:
> [PR 14578 ](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14578) still has unresolved
> discussions, continue to make improvements.
>
> # Benchmark Result
>
>
> sh make/devkit/createJMHBundle.sh
> bash configure --with-jmh=build/jmh/jars
> make test TEST="m
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 01:44:15 GMT, 温绍锦 wrote:
> [PR 14578 ](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14578) still has unresolved
> discussions, continue to make improvements.
>
> # Benchmark Result
>
>
> sh make/devkit/createJMHBundle.sh
> bash configure --with-jmh=build/jmh/jars
> make test TEST="m
[PR 14578 ](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14578) still has unresolved
discussions, continue to make improvements.
# Benchmark Result
sh make/devkit/createJMHBundle.sh
bash configure --with-jmh=build/jmh/jars
make test TEST="micro:java.util.UUIDBench.toString"
## 1.
[aliyun_ecs_c8i.xlar
19 matches
Mail list logo
