On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 19:42:23 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> I ran tier1-tier3 tests with your patch and all passed.
Good. @koppor You can edit the PR title to match the JBS issue, then enter
"/integrate" and one of us will sponsor.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13442#i
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:18:13 GMT, Oliver Kopp wrote:
> This refs [https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8306038](8306038).
>
> (Before this referenced 8240567)
>
> Although this change is rather small, I think, it's good to have a "more
> clean" SystemModulesPlugin available.
I ran tier1-tier3
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:18:13 GMT, Oliver Kopp wrote:
> This refs [https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8306038](8306038).
>
> (Before this referenced 8240567)
>
> Although this change is rather small, I think, it's good to have a "more
> clean" SystemModulesPlugin available.
or you can just r
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 08:21:11 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> This looks right. I assume you've checked `java
> -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:+BytecodeVerificationLocal -version` as
> this code is not normally verified
koppor@DESKTOP-KAK953S
/cygdrive/c/git-repositories/jdk/jdk/build/windows-
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:18:13 GMT, Oliver Kopp wrote:
> This refs [https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8306038](8306038).
>
> (Before this referenced 8240567)
>
> Although this change is rather small, I think, it's good to have a "more
> clean" SystemModulesPlugin available.
This looks okay.
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:18:13 GMT, Oliver Kopp wrote:
> This refs [https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8306038](8306038).
>
> (Before this referenced 8240567)
>
> Although this change is rather small, I think, it's good to have a "more
> clean" SystemModulesPlugin available.
Thank you for cre
