On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 22:12:20 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Take the class file version to reject flags not yet defined, redefined, or
>> obsoleted. This is useful for clients like javap to report the correct
>> undefined flags for different class file versions.
>>
>> A preparatory patch for javap
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 22:12:20 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Take the class file version to reject flags not yet defined, redefined, or
>> obsoleted. This is useful for clients like javap to report the correct
>> undefined flags for different class file versions.
>>
>> A preparatory patch for javap
> Take the class file version to reject flags not yet defined, redefined, or
> obsoleted. This is useful for clients like javap to report the correct
> undefined flags for different class file versions.
>
> A preparatory patch for javap to pass around the ClassFileFormatVersion to
> parse flags
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 18:17:27 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Take the class file version to reject flags not yet defined, redefined, or
>> obsoleted. This is useful for clients like javap to report the correct
>> undefined flags for different class file versions.
>>
>> A preparatory patch for javap
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 18:17:27 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Take the class file version to reject flags not yet defined, redefined, or
>> obsoleted. This is useful for clients like javap to report the correct
>> undefined flags for different class file versions.
>>
>> A preparatory patch for javap
> Take the class file version to reject flags not yet defined, redefined, or
> obsoleted. This is useful for clients like javap to report the correct
> undefined flags for different class file versions.
>
> A preparatory patch for javap to pass around the ClassFileFormatVersion to
> parse flags
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:48:01 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Take the class file version to reject flags not yet defined, redefined, or
>> obsoleted. This is useful for clients like javap to report the correct
>> undefined flags for different class file versions.
>>
>> A preparatory patch for javap
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 20:01:23 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/AccessFlag.java line 401:
>>
>>> 399: public static Set maskToAccessFlags(int mask, Location
>>> location, ClassFileFormatVersion cffv) {
>>> 400: var definition = findDefinition(loc
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:59:46 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> Unfortunately the cffv-aware maskToAccessFlags introduction and old
> maskToAccessFlags migration to reject STRICTFP are bundled together - this
> means javap will need an ad-hoc facility to parse instead of using these
> APIs. Is that the
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:48:01 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Take the class file version to reject flags not yet defined, redefined, or
>> obsoleted. The non-cffv version can return the preview flags when the
>> current runtime is in preview.
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new tar
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:41:23 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 10 commits:
>>
>> - Wording updates
>> - Merge branch 'feature/af-location-accessors' into feature/af-cffv-parse
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:12:01 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Take the class file version to reject flags not yet defined, redefined, or
>> obsoleted. The non-cffv version can return the preview flags when the
>> current runtime is in preview.
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new tar
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:48:01 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Take the class file version to reject flags not yet defined, redefined, or
>> obsoleted. The non-cffv version can return the preview flags when the
>> current runtime is in preview.
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new tar
> Take the class file version to reject flags not yet defined, redefined, or
> obsoleted. The non-cffv version can return the preview flags when the current
> runtime is in preview.
Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
or a rebase. The pull request now c
> Take the class file version to reject flags not yet defined, redefined, or
> obsoleted. The non-cffv version can return the preview flags when the current
> runtime is in preview.
Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
or a rebase. The pull request now c
> Take the class file version to reject flags not yet defined, redefined, or
> obsoleted. The non-cffv version can return the preview flags when the current
> runtime is in preview.
Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since the last revision:
- Mi
> Take the class file version to reject flags not yet defined, redefined, or
> obsoleted. The non-cffv version can return the preview flags when the current
> runtime is in preview.
Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
or a rebase. The pull request now c
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 20:33:27 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> Take the class file version to reject flags not yet defined, redefined, or
> obsoleted. The non-cffv version can return the preview flags when the current
> runtime is in preview.
That is tracked in a separate bug linked as a dependent on t
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 20:33:27 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> Take the class file version to reject flags not yet defined, redefined, or
> obsoleted. The non-cffv version can return the preview flags when the current
> runtime is in preview.
With this, the **Class‑File API** needs to be updated to pas
Take the class file version to reject flags not yet defined, redefined, or
obsoleted. The non-cffv version can return the preview flags when the current
runtime is in preview.
-
Depends on: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23095
Commit messages:
- 8297271: AccessFlag.maskToAccessF
20 matches
Mail list logo
