/libapplauncher.so)
...
Would this be enough to cause an otherwise silent failure?
[1] https://www.flatpak.org/
--
Mark Raynsford | https://www.io7m.com
is a bit rough at the moment. v4 is far easier to set up, but
obviously not supported yet (they've removed/renamed various
executables, as you probably know).
--
Mark Raynsford | https://www.io7m.com
On Mon, 2023-11-27 at 16:09 +, Mark Raynsford wrote:
>
> As I mentioned in the blog, I feel like almost all of the
> functionality might already be there (minus a way to get the runtime
> to use -p instead of -cp internally), it's just that there doesn't
> appear to
On Mon, 2023-11-27 at 14:42 +, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 27/11/2023 11:44, Mark Raynsford wrote:
> > I'm not entirely convinced that discussion on this list doesn't get
> > lost in the endless sea of "RFR: " messages. :)
>
> It was originally sent to
urce projects through fully
modularizing, but some projects just don't have the resources to do the
work.
--
Mark Raynsford | https://www.io7m.com
