On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 20:26:45 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>>> Is it intentional?
>>
>> It was probably by mistake. but you are right, I see it mentioned already in
>> the doc. I don't think we need to mention it again?
>
> It has a value… when it's mentioned with `@see`, the link is present in the
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 15:12:55 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 186 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411
>> - Update copyrights
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 15:03:23 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 150 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411
>> - Merge
>> - Updat
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 22:52:32 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> @prrace Can you please advice on “Audit Core Reflection” category of tests.
>> I'm not 100% sure if these tests need to be deleted or retained (May be some
>> of them are required for code coverage purpose and/or testing code paths
>> that
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 18:09:46 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 150 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411
>> - Merge
>> - Updat
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:47:31 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> This doubt applies to all the tests which exercise lazy values or similar
>> logic… without and *with* the security manager.
>>
>> Now, without the security manager, the problematic cases are no longer
>> relevant; the common path *with
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 18:08:16 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 150 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411
>> - Merge
>> - Updat
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:36:46 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 150 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411
>> - Merge
>> - Updat
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 17:52:59 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> This particular test was failing on windows & linux after SM removal. There
>> is a functional issue and for that reason I think it is better to retain
>> this test. Details documented here -
>> [JDK-8342012](https://bugs.openjdk.org/br
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:57:18 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 150 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411
>> - Merge
>> - Updat
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 17:16:54 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 150 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411
>> - Merge
>> - Updat
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 20:23:26 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> @aivanov-jdk
>> It was missed when -Djava.security.manager=allow was removed.
>> Out of curiosity: does it have any impact on the performance of CI testing
>> if tests are run in `/othervm` mode when it is not needed?
>
>> It was missed
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:11:18 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 150 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411
>> - Merge
>> - Updat
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:35:44 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 150 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411
>> - Merge
>> - Updat
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:55:57 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 150 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411
>> - Merge
>> - Updat
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 05:11:19 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 97 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411
>> - Change apiNo
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 19:38:10 GMT, Harshitha Onkar wrote:
>> test/jdk/javax/imageio/CachePremissionsTest/CachePermissionsTest.java line
>> 76:
>>
>>> 74: System.out.println("java.io.tmpdir is " +
>>> System.getProperty("java.io.tmpd
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 21:12:29 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 97 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411
>> - Change apiNote to depr
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:29:38 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 97 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411
>> - Change apiNo
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:16:38 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 97 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411
>> - Change apiNo
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:03:30 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security
>> Manager. See [JEP 486](https://openjdk.org/jeps/486) for more details. The
>> [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338412) describes in detail the
>> main ch
> ViewportOverlapping was failing intermittently on Windows (Win10 & 11). Added
> robot.setAutoWaitForIdle() to ViewportOverlapping and its base class
> (OverlappingTestBase) to stabilize the test.
>
> Additionally added awt & swings tests to exclusiveAccess.dir in TEST
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 20:03:38 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> @jaikiran Thank you for the details. I'll check if the duration of run
>> differed drastically. I thought all the client tests run in non-concurrent
>> mode by default or does this differ for headful and headless test?
>
> *Headful* test
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 01:12:12 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> ViewportOverlapping was failing intermittently on Windows (Win10 & 11).
>> Added robot.setAutoWaitForIdle() to ViewportOverlapping and its base class
>> (OverlappingTestBase) to stabilize the test.
>>
>> Additionally added awt & swings t
ViewportOverlapping was failing intermittently on Windows (Win10 & 11). Added
robot.setAutoWaitForIdle() to ViewportOverlapping and its base class
(OverlappingTestBase) to stabilize the test.
Additionally added awt & swings tests to exclusiveAccess.dir in TEST.ROOT.
-
Commit messag
25 matches
Mail list logo
