On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 03:13:05 GMT, Nicole Xu wrote:
>> The UnsafeOps JMH benchmark fails with the following error:
>>
>> ```
>> java.lang.IllegalAccessError: class
>> org.openjdk.bench.sun.misc.UnsafeOps (in unnamed module @0x520a3426) cannot
>> access class jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 08:35:47 GMT, Nicole Xu wrote:
> As is suggested in
> [JDK-8342958](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8342958), `jvmArgs` should
> be used consistently in microbenchmarks to 'align with the intuition that
> when you use jvmArgsAppend/-Prepend intent is to add to a set of
On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 04:16:57 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Several JMH tests fails "Unrecognized VM option 'UseAVX=2'" on
>> linux-aarch64. The VM option '-XX:UseAVX=2' only support on x86_64 platform.
>> This PR add option '-XX:+IgnoreUnrecognizedVMOptions' to make test run
>> normally o
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 15:14:18 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [4d8fb807](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/4d8fb80732fd17352c36254c6dfc1be5dbfbacf1)
> from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository to jdk24.
>
> The commi
On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 14:37:44 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
> Several JMH tests fails "Unrecognized VM option 'UseAVX=2'" on linux-aarch64.
> The VM option '-XX:UseAVX=2' only support on x86_64 platform. This PR add
> option '-XX:+IgnoreUnrecognizedVMOptions' to make test run normally on non
>
On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:07:43 GMT, Hao Sun wrote:
> > Hi @shqking , thanks for your review. I am currently working on adding the
> > aarch64 port for these operations. It's being done here -
> > [jatin-bhateja#6](https://github.com/jatin-bhateja/jdk/pull/6). Do you
&g
On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 02:41:47 GMT, Hao Sun wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This patch adds C2 compiler support for various Float16 operations added by
>> [PR#22128](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/22128)
>>
>> Following is the summary of changes included with
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:40:01 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This patch adds C2 compiler support for various Float16 operations added by
> [PR#22128](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/22128)
>
> Following is the summary of changes included with this patch:-
>
> 1. Detection of vario
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 02:06:29 GMT, Hao Sun wrote:
> The fix is trivial. We should include the standard C header `stdlib.h` [1],
> rather than non-standard one `malloc.h`.
>
> [1] https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/memory/malloc
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changes
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 02:06:29 GMT, Hao Sun wrote:
> The fix is trivial. We should include the standard C header `stdlib.h` [1],
> rather than non-standard one `malloc.h`.
>
> [1] https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/memory/malloc
Thanks for your reviews.
-
PR Co
The fix is trivial. We should include the standard C header `stdlib.h` [1],
rather than non-standard one `malloc.h`.
[1] https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/memory/malloc
-
Commit messages:
- 8320131: Zero build fails on macOS after JDK-8254693
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pul
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 07:02:16 GMT, Hao Sun wrote:
> This warning seems to be a false positive, because 1) array "fq" with
> elements from index 0 to "jz" has already been initialized as "fw" at line
> 290 [1], and 2) variable "jz" should
On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 01:39:41 GMT, Hao Sun wrote:
>> This warning seems to be a false positive, because 1) array "fq" with
>> elements from index 0 to "jz" has already been initialized as "fw" at line
>> 290 [1], and 2) variable "jz"
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 12:47:24 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Thanks for your review.
>>
>> Your mentioned solution should work and we can also enable the pragma only
>> for aarch64 + gcc>=12 condition.
>> I considered such a solution when preparing this patch.
>>
>> But I personally prefer t
s://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/java.base/share/native/libfdlibm/k_rem_pio2.c#L290
>
> [2]
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/java.base/share/native/libfdlibm/k_rem_pio2.c#L99
>
> [3] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106992
Hao Sun has updated the p
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 09:35:47 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> This warning seems to be a false positive, because 1) array "fq" with
>> elements from index 0 to "jz" has already been initialized as "fw" at line
>> 290 [1], and 2) variable "jz" should be non-negative from the comment at
>> line 99 [2
This warning seems to be a false positive, because 1) array "fq" with elements
from index 0 to "jz" has already been initialized as "fw" at line 290 [1], and
2) variable "jz" should be non-negative from the comment at line 99 [2].
Note-1: GCC warning option -Wmaybe-uninitialized is not a new one
17 matches
Mail list logo
