On Thu, 15 May 2025 16:03:44 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> This intrinsic is generally faster than the current implementation for
>> Panama segment operations for all writes larger than about 8 bytes in size,
>> increasing to more than 2* the performance on larger memory blocks on
>> Graviton 2,
On Wed, 14 May 2025 10:47:40 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> This intrinsic is generally faster than the current implementation for
>> Panama segment operations for all writes larger than about 8 bytes in size,
>> increasing to more than 2* the performance on larger memory blocks on
>> Graviton 2,
On Mon, 12 May 2025 09:37:24 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> This intrinsic is generally faster than the current implementation for
>> Panama segment operations for all writes larger than about 8 bytes in size,
>> increasing to more than 2* the performance on larger memory blocks on
>> Graviton 2,
On Fri, 9 May 2025 15:39:35 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> This intrinsic is generally faster than the current implementation for
>> Panama segment operations for all writes larger than about 8 bytes in size,
>> increasing to more than 2* the performance on larger memory blocks on
>> Graviton 2,
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 22:59:29 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
> This is a general fix for all the "points to a static field that may hold a
> different value" failures related to `java/lang/invoke/MethodHandleImpl`.
> E.g., [JDK-8354840](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8354840),
> [JDK-8353330](https:/
On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 17:26:08 GMT, Quan Anh Mai wrote:
>>> Hi again Per!
>>>
>>> Here are some brief notes from our face-to-face chat at JavaOne.
>>>
>>> Debuggers want/need a "hook" for tentative evaluation of stables. It is an
>>> error for a debugger to trigger stable value decisions. This a
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 14:13:35 GMT, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>> Currently, `ParserVerifier#verifyConstantPool` uses a `switch` to produce a
>> `Runnable`, which is consumed by a `Consumer` (instantiated within
>> a loop) which runs the task inside if a `try`/`catch`. We can eliminate a
>> number of
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 18:45:49 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
> This is the 7th and final PR for [JEP 483: Ahead-of-Time Class Loading &
> Linking](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8315737).
>
> This PR implements the AOT-linking of invokedynamic callsites:
> - We only link lambda expressions (`LambdaMet
Asking if they will bypass these
methods.
Why can you not look at David's repo? He is a JDK author (dmlloyd) and
this work is being done as part of his employment by Red Hat.
regards,
Andrew Dinn
---
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 09:31:18 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Kind of aligning with the "Donaudampfschiffahrtsgesellschaftskapitän"
>> prejudice of German. ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>> (In Sweden, we have "flaggstångsknoppsförgyllare" so you are not alone)
>
> Hah! My kids just recently informed me about
>
On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 05:11:28 GMT, Alexander Kriegisch wrote:
> Bytecode transformation should not be rocket science, but it progressively is
> developing in that direction.
Hmm? Bytecode transformation of the JDK runtime implementation is a lot more
complicated than your comments seem to ackno
On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 22:33:01 GMT, Rafael Winterhalter
wrote:
> What stops people from supplying a fake instance? Wouldn't you need to "test
> run" the instance first?
Not necessarily. When the generated API implementation relies on the
capabilities of class `Instrumentation` -- such as openin
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 10:17:16 GMT, Alexander Kriegisch wrote:
>>> @AlanBateman, the AspectJ weaving agent creates an auxiliary class to
>>> implement an "around" advice for a method, i.e. a method execution is
>>> intercepted and the user has options to do something before optionally
>>> callin
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:16:13 GMT, Rafael Winterhalter
wrote:
> Requiring such an API opens the module to anybody, though, punching a hole
> into the module boundary.
How so? Any module created to print Lookups can easily rely on a shared secret
to secure the API. Byteman employs a non-null In
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 06:39:56 GMT, Alexander Kriegisch wrote:
>> Setting '-javaagent' is mainly an operations problem. Many build tools do
>> not allow to declare a test dependency this way as the life cycles are not
>> laid out for it, the internal repository location might be machine
>> dependen
On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 15:48:31 GMT, Christian Wimmer wrote:
> We (as the Native Image team) are OK with this. Our testing will detect that
> pretty quickly, and then the new code can be fixed.
That may well be the case. However, until all the concerns raised by OpenJDK
reviewers who have looked
16 matches
Mail list logo
