`-XX:+AOTClassLinking` requires the CDS archived full module graph (FMG).
- Before this PR, when `--add-export` is specified, FMG is disabled, so AOT
caches created with `-XX:+AOTClassLinking` cannot be loaded.
- After this PR, if the exact same `--add-export` flags as specified across the
tra
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 19:51:36 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> Automate setting up an environment for mac signing tests: create keychain(s),
> self-signing certificates, and register them in the system.
>
> To set up the environment, run `make test-only
> TEST=test/jdk/tools/jpackage/macosx/base/S
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 15:49:37 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StableValue.java line 45:
>>
>>> 43:
>>> 44: /**
>>> 45: * A stable value is a shallowly immutable holder of deferred content.
>>
>> Is this terminology a leftover from previous JEP iteratio
> Implement JEP 502.
>
> The PR passes tier1-tier3 tests.
Per Minborg has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
or a rebase. The pull request now contains 249 commits:
- Fix comments on doc issues
- Create separate reentry prevention method and add tests
- Merge bran
> The recent patch #23866 makes calling `ClassValue::remove()` from
> `ClassValue::computeValue()` end up in infinite loops while fixing the stale
> value risk from the method.
>
> The proposed fix is to preserve the stale value risk fix, and update the
> remove-from-compute behavior from the o
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 09:20:33 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> can't rule anything in or out right now
+1
@AlanBateman @dholmes-ora Does it look reasonable to not run these tests on
static JDK for now?
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24103#issuecomment-2738148828
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 09:17:06 GMT, KIRIYAMA Takuya wrote:
> The current test program for the logging feature added in JDK-8301627 does
> not fully check some important cases.
>
> Issue Details:
> The test does not properly check cases where logging might not happen due to
> different logging le
> Upgrading the CLDR to version 47.0. A corresponding CSR has also been drafted.
Naoto Sato has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Copyright year/bugid update
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24120/files
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 19:01:03 GMT, Joe Wang wrote:
> Add public identifiers to the JDK built-in Catalog; Replace the incorrect
> Schema 1.1 DTD files (note the Public Identifier at line 2) with the correct
> Schema 1.0 DTDs. The JDK built-in Catalog contains Schema 1.0 files only.
>
> DTD files
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 09:36:43 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
>> (Copied from https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319447)
>>
>> The problems addressed by this CR/PR are that ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor is
>> both ill-suited for many (if not most) of its applications, and is a
>> performance bottleneck (a
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:43:28 GMT, Joe Wang wrote:
>> Add public identifiers to the JDK built-in Catalog; Replace the incorrect
>> Schema 1.1 DTD files (note the Public Identifier at line 2) with the correct
>> Schema 1.0 DTDs. The JDK built-in Catalog contains Schema 1.0 files only.
>>
>> DTD
On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 03:30:46 GMT, John Rose wrote:
> This might seem to contradict my previous assertion
> that StableValue, being mutex based, must not
> use lock-free idioms. That comment applies
> specifically to the update operation that takes
> a lambda. Other operations, such as reading
> a
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 19:31:31 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> add code comment
>
> test/jdk/java/util/zip/ZipFile/ZipFileSharedSourceTest.java line 78:
>
>> 76:
>> 77: /**
>
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:03:00 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Hello Jaikiran,
>>
>> I'm not convinced dropping `zipCoderForPos` is a step forward:
>>
>> * `zipCoderForPos` included a short-circuit optimization logic which skipped
>> reading the CENFLG field in the case where the opening charset was
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 13:17:19 GMT, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> please review this change that implements (currently Draft) JEP: G1:
>> Improve Application Throughput with a More Efficient Write-Barrier.
>>
>> The reason for posting this early is that this is a large change, and the
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 18:27:56 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Joe Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> update the test: change variables and etc.
>
> src/java.xml/share/classes/jdk/xml/internal/jdkcatalog/w3c/dtd/schema10/XMLSc
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:43:28 GMT, Joe Wang wrote:
>> Add public identifiers to the JDK built-in Catalog; Replace the incorrect
>> Schema 1.1 DTD files (note the Public Identifier at line 2) with the correct
>> Schema 1.0 DTDs. The JDK built-in Catalog contains Schema 1.0 files only.
>>
>> DTD
Hi Davide,
jpackage should work seamlessly with WiX5. Could you run your jpackage
command with `--verbose` arg? It will provide a context for the error.
- Alexey
On 3/19/2025 6:19 AM, Davide Perini wrote:
I add some context:
I installed wix 5 using the donet command globally,
wix is in the
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 19:55:39 GMT, Joe Wang wrote:
>> src/java.xml/share/classes/jdk/xml/internal/jdkcatalog/w3c/dtd/schema10/XMLSchema.dtd
>> line 8:
>>
>>> 6:
>>>
>>> 7:
>>>
>>> 8:
>>>
>>
>> The other XML comments use the multi-line format with a single begin
> Hi all,
>
> please review this change that implements (currently Draft) JEP: G1:
> Improve Application Throughput with a More Efficient Write-Barrier.
>
> The reason for posting this early is that this is a large change, and the JEP
> process is already taking very long with no end in sight
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 02:02:56 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
>> Please review this PR that adds `@requires !jdk.static` to tests, thanks.
>>
>> - runtime/StackGap/TestStackGap.java
>> - runtime/StackGuardPages/TestStackGuardPages.java
>> - runtime/TLS/TestTLS.java
>> - runtime/jni/daemonDestroy/TestDae
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 09:11:05 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> For the folks targeting embedded/small environments then I think the right
> thing is to publish the packaged modules (JMOD files) for the target platform
> and then use `jlink` to create the run-image with the right VM + small set of
> m
8351843: change
open/test/jdk/com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/RootDirPermissionsTest.java
to a manual test
-
Commit messages:
- 8351843:change
open/test/jdk/com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/RootDirPermissionsTest.java
to a manual test
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:11:00 GMT, Dmitry Chuyko wrote:
>> Please review a tiny fix in the ForkJoinPool. Since JDK 9 (JDK-8134852 [1])
>> in one case when TC subfield in ctl field is decremented, the applied
>> masking (UMASK, upper bits) may not preserve neighbor RC subfield sometimes.
>> In J
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 13:34:51 GMT, Dmitry Chuyko wrote:
> Please review a tiny fix in the ForkJoinPool. Since JDK 9 (JDK-8134852 [1])
> in one case when TC subfield in ctl field is decremented, the applied masking
> (UMASK, upper bits) may not preserve neighbor RC subfield sometimes. In JDKs
>
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:11:00 GMT, Dmitry Chuyko wrote:
>> Please review a tiny fix in the ForkJoinPool. Since JDK 9 (JDK-8134852 [1])
>> in one case when TC subfield in ctl field is decremented, the applied
>> masking (UMASK, upper bits) may not preserve neighbor RC subfield sometimes.
>> In J
I add some context:
I installed wix 5 using the donet command globally,
wix is in the path but when I try to run my jpackage command I get this
error:
jpackage -i ./target --type exe --main-class
org.dpsoftware.JavaFXStarter --main-jar
FireflyLuciferin-jar-with-dependencies.jar --icon
./dat
Hi there,
I'm using jpackage along with Wix3.
The command I use to generate my .exe is:
jpackage -i ../../target --type exe --main-class
org.dpsoftware.JavaFXStarter --main-jar
FireflyLuciferin-jar-with-dependencies.jar --icon
../../data/img/java_fast_screen_capture_logo.ico --win
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:31:27 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> And to be absolutely clear: this PR is just about adding new functionality
> that was not present before.
Sure but I think it's also an attractive nuisance. The VM is very tightly
coupled to java.base and a few other core modules. I
> Changes for [JEP draft: Structured Concurrency (Fifth
> Preview)](https://openjdk.org/jeps/8340343). The JEP isn't on the technical
> roadmap yet. The proposal is to re-preview the API with some changes,
> specifically:
>
> - A
> [StructuredTaskScope](https://download.java.net/java/early_acc
30 matches
Mail list logo
