> Please review this patch which removes unnecessary `@SuppressWarnings`
> annotations.
Archie Cobbs has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
or a rebase. The pull request now contains 22 commits:
- Merge branch 'master' into SuppressWarningsCleanup-core-libs to fix
It might be useful to be able to run testing with --enable-preview for feature
development. The tests incompatible with this mode must be filtered out.
I chose name 'java.enablePreview' , because it is more java property than vm or
jdk. And 'enablePreview' to be similar with jtreg tag.
Tested
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 16:27:03 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> This change adds an API note to these methods recommending that the caller
> should perform further validation steps on the code signers that signed the
> JAR file, such as validating the code signer's certificate chain, and
> determining
> From: "Viktor Klang"
> To: "Paul Sandoz" , "Fabian Meumertzheim"
>
> Cc: "core-libs-dev"
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2025 11:30:59 PM
> Subject: Re: JDK-8072840: Presizing for Stream Collectors
> Indeed. I hope I didn't sound discouraging about the possibility to propagate
> the stream siz
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 14:30:25 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> Don't consider functions without `jdk.jpackage.test.Annotations.Test`
> annotation as tests.
>
> Additionally, enhance the functionality of
> `jdk.jpackage.test.Annotations.ParameterSupplier` annotation: make an empty
> string the def
Thanks for your feedback and for making me aware of the complications
around Gatherers.
I will also put more thought into how this could work for Gatherers.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025, 23:31 Viktor Klang wrote:
> Indeed. I hope I didn't sound discouraging about the possibility to
> propagate the stre