> After 8339120, gcc began catching many different instances of unused code in
> the Windows specific codebase. Some of these seem to be bugs. I've taken the
> effort to mark out all the relevant globals and locals that trigger the
> unused warnings and addressed all of them by commenting out th
> This fixes a problem in the VTMS (Virtual Thread Mount State) transition
> frames hiding mechanism.
> Please, see a fix description in the first comment.
>
> Testing:
> - Verified with new test `vthread/CheckHiddenFrames`
> - Mach5 tiers 1-6 are passed
Serguei Spitsyn has updated the pull re
Dear Sirs,
apparently my opening of PR and CSR in DRAFT state gave the impression that
these documents are published to request reviews. This is NOT the case!
Both documents are still and fully intentionally in DRAFT state. I published
them solely for the purpose of a public storage of my w
>Is it a follow up change/PR for various places which would benefit from using
>the new method?
Yes, there will be a subsequent PR for various places other than
Reader.of(CharSequence).
-Markus
> This PR split out large array/set construction into separate factory methods
> to avoid oversized method trying to construct several of those.
>
> In order to do that, we will need to generate those help methods on demand in
> the class builder. Here we have two approach, one is for dedup set,
> Port of Float16 from java.lang in the lworld+fp16 branch to
> jdk.incubabor.vector.
Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or
a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by
the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 14 addi
+1 to option A.
Option C is too limiting on uses for the target. It could be added as a
default which calls through to option A, if there is meaningful demand.
Is it a follow up change/PR for various places which would benefit from
using the new method?
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 1:34 PM Markus Kar
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:13:58 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> 8342083: Make a few fields in FileSystemPreferences final
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 0e3fc93d
Author:Andrey Turbanov
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/0e3fc93dfb14378a848571a6b83282c0c73e690f
Chen,
thank you for chiming in! :-)
Answering in PR draft's discussion thread, where you asked the same question
meanwhile, to not duplicate discussions.
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21730
-Markus
Von: Chen Liang [mailto:liangchenb...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Samstag, 2
Hi Markus,
Should we drop the srcBigin/srcEnd parameters, as they can be replaced by a
subSequence(srcBegin, srcEnd) call?
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024, 12:34 PM Markus Karg wrote:
> I hereby request for comments on the proposal to generalize the existing
> method "String.getChars()"'s signature to beco
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 10:43:54 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
>> That had been discussed here:
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21371#pullrequestreview-2350588453
>
> Stay tuned. I have already forwarded a subsequent RFE and PR to cover this
> topic. 🤩
I just filed the PR to implement `CharSequen
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 09:06:42 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
>> I believe this batch operation would be a useful addition, but it is best
>> reserved for another RFE.
>
> Agree to Chen. As I already wrote in [the
> RFE](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8341566):
>>As this option is not essentially ne
> This addresses tendencies in previous update to increase fencing, scanning,
> and signalling that can increase contention, and slow down performance
> especially on ARM platforms. It also uses more ARM-friendly constructions to
> reduce overhead (leading to several changes that all of the same
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 03:06:39 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> Discovered this small cleanup while looking at wrapper class code.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 40e07a7e
Author:Chen Liang
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/40e07a7ea31d04722cda3e6d2fc988df50a7cdca
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 21:25:54 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> Moved from
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21672/commits/ade90fb51d1e3652910a3b46775522b730306e16:
>
> Please review the fix that uses String type for the mapped value in
> ModuleLoaderMap.Mapper map (Map). Please see details in
>
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 21:35:37 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> Remove `--compress` from jlink command lines in jpackage tests
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 9e451aa3
Author:Alexey Semenyuk
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/9e451aa36586badc7be58804ae6f12e6b67
> This addresses tendencies in previous update to increase fencing, scanning,
> and signalling that can increase contention, and slow down performance
> especially on ARM platforms. It also uses more ARM-friendly constructions to
> reduce overhead (leading to several changes that all of the same
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 06:56:30 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> This PR is simply adding parameter-less `java.io.IO.{println(),readln()}`,
>> with the (hopefully) obvious semantics, plus the corresponding wiring to
>> make those work. This may become part of JEP 495:
>> https://openjdk.org/jeps/495
>
>
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:22:28 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> After 8339120, gcc began catching many different instances of unused code in
>> the Windows specific codebase. Some of these seem to be bugs. I've taken the
>> effort to mark out all the relevant globals and locals that trigger the
>> u
On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 01:54:26 GMT, Dean Long wrote:
>> Patricio Chilano Mateo has updated the pull request incrementally with two
>> additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Restore use of atPointA in test StopThreadTest.java
>> - remove interruptible check from conditional in Objec
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 21:28:22 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo
wrote:
>> If it's always the current thread, then it should be called 'current' imo.
>
> I see that in lightweightSynchronizer.cpp we already use the name
> `locking_thread` (although
> `LightweightSynchronizer::inflate_into_object_heade
21 matches
Mail list logo
