On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 09:52:59 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which fixes the final few typos in
> test files in the core-libs area? This addresses the remaining core-libs
> related typos from the original PR https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/10029.
This pul
On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 09:52:59 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which fixes the final few typos in
> test files in the core-libs area? This addresses the remaining core-libs
> related typos from the original PR https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/10029.
Thank yo
> Fix for [JDK-8240567](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8240567):
> "MethodTooLargeException thrown while creating a jlink image".
>
> Java still has a 64kb limit: A method may not be longer than 64kb. The idea
> of the fix is to split up the generated methods in several smaller methods
Oli
On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 10:03:02 GMT, Peter Levart wrote:
> Here, the benefit of increasing buffer from 8k to 16k gets from about 10%
> (doing IO) up to 20% (reading from cache) increase in performance.
I think 10% to 20% is good enough as an argument to go with 16k instead of 8k.
-
PR
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 18:02:53 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
> Refactor LambdaForm constructors into static factories.
>
> In the new code, there's only 1 constructor, which simply initializes all
> fields. Multiple factory methods are built on top of this, which add various
> argument validation/pre-p
On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 09:52:59 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which fixes the final few typos in
> test files in the core-libs area? This addresses the remaining core-libs
> related typos from the original PR https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/10029.
Marked a
On Fri, 23 Dec 2022 22:28:34 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
> I/O had always been much slower than CPU and memory access, and thanks to
> physical constraints, always will be.
> While CPUs can get shrinked more and more, and can hold more and more memory
> cache on or nearby a CPU core, the distance b
Can I please get a review of this change which fixes the final few typos in
test files in the core-libs area? This addresses the remaining core-libs
related typos from the original PR https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/10029.
-
Commit messages:
- 8299441: Fix typos in some test fi
