Re: RFR: 8294696 - BufferedInputStream.transferTo should drain buffer when mark set [v2]

2022-10-22 Thread Alan Bateman
On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 08:31:07 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >> Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Checking explicitly -1 instead of < 0 > >> * Alternative B: Instead of double-buffering I drop the original buffer and

Re: RFR: 8284840: Update CLDR to Version 42.0

2022-10-22 Thread Steven R . Loomis
On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 08:14:00 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: > > Yes. These translation changes affect formatting. We don't usually file a > > CSR for such changes, but cover them in our release notes. > > Indeed and periodically CLDR upgrades do cause breakage somewhere, often it > will be a library

Re: RFR: 8294696 - BufferedInputStream.transferTo should drain buffer when mark set [v2]

2022-10-22 Thread Markus KARG
On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 08:31:07 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >> Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Checking explicitly -1 instead of < 0 > >> * Alternative B: Instead of double-buffering I drop the original buffer and

Re: RFR: 8294696 - BufferedInputStream.transferTo should drain buffer when mark set [v3]

2022-10-22 Thread Markus KARG
> This PR implements JDK-8294696. Markus KARG has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains three additional commits since the last revision: - Alt

Re: RFR: 8284840: Update CLDR to Version 42.0

2022-10-22 Thread Alan Bateman
On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 19:46:36 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: > Yes. These translation changes affect formatting. We don't usually file a CSR > for such changes, but cover them in our release notes. Indeed and periodically CLDR upgrades do cause breakage somewhere, often it will be a library or applicat