On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 17:00:38 GMT, Alex Kasko wrote:
> This change splits existing single Feature `DefaultFeature` into 3 different
> feautures:
>
> - `DefaultFeature_Files`: application and runtime files
> - `DefaultFeature_Shortcuts`: application Desktop and Start Menu shortcuts
> - `Default
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 17:33:21 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8065554: MatchResult should provide values of named-capturing groups
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/re
> Add support for named groups to java.util.regex.MatchResult
Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
8065554: MatchResult should provide values of named-capturing groups
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.op
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:26:32 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti wrote:
>> Add support for named groups to java.util.regex.MatchResult
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> 8065554: MatchResult should provide values o
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:26:32 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti wrote:
>> Add support for named groups to java.util.regex.MatchResult
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> 8065554: MatchResult should provide values o
On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 20:51:59 GMT, Brent Christian wrote:
>> Please review this change to replace the finalizer in
>> `AbstractLdapNamingEnumeration` with a Cleaner.
>>
>> The pieces of state required for cleanup (`LdapCtx homeCtx`, `LdapResult
>> res`, and `LdapClient enumClnt`) are moved to a
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 15:59:23 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> Smita Kamath has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Addressed review comments
>
> Can you please file a follow up issue to write a test (gtest?) for the `f2hf`
> and `hf2f`
On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 02:26:19 GMT, Yoshiki Sato wrote:
> Please review this PR. The PR adopts the official tzdata2022c as it is.
> It means the pre-1970s data merged in tzdata2022c doesn't exist.
> All tests have been passed with no failures.
LGTM
-
Marked as reviewed by naoto (Rev
On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 07:26:46 GMT, Ichiroh Takiguchi
wrote:
> After `test/jdk/java/util/TimeZone/CustomTzIDCheckDST.java` testcase was
> integrated, it failed on the AIX platform.
>
> Error output
>
> STDERR:
> stdout: [];
> stderr: [Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: Got
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 00:52:49 GMT, Smita Kamath wrote:
>> 8289552: Make intrinsic conversions between bit representations of half
>> precision values and floats
>
> Smita Kamath has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Addressed revie
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 13:37:23 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> > I mean, there is no button in Github that would allow me to do that.
>
> On the right side of the page (at the top), search for "Still in progress?"
> "Convert to draft". That's a link (and I agree it's not easy to spot)
Thanks, this wor
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 12:34:49 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
> I mean, there is no button in Github that would allow me to do that.
On the right side of the page (at the top), search for "Still in progress?"
"Convert to draft". That's a link (and I agree it's not easy to spot)
-
PR: https:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 02:26:19 GMT, Yoshiki Sato wrote:
> Please review this PR. The PR adopts the official tzdata2022c as it is.
> It means the pre-1970s data merged in tzdata2022c doesn't exist.
> All tests have been passed with no failures.
The test failure seems to be irrelevant to this fix.
Please review this PR. The PR adopts the official tzdata2022c as it is.
It means the pre-1970s data merged in tzdata2022c doesn't exist.
All tests have been passed with no failures.
-
Commit messages:
- Merge branch 'master' into tz2022c
- The first fix for tz2022c
Changes: https:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 07:50:53 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> It's probably best to change to back to draft until there is an updated
> proposal.
I would love to, but how to do that? I mean, there is no button in Github that
would allow *me* to do that.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:43:12 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
>> Implementation of JDK-8279283
>
> Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> fixed missing BufferedInputStream
> /open
>
> I will continue work on this in the next w
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:43:12 GMT, Markus KARG wrote:
>> Implementation of JDK-8279283
>
> Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> fixed missing BufferedInputStream
Will this be reopened somewhen? The proposed changes se
17 matches
Mail list logo
