Re: JMH results for IndexedLinkedList

2022-07-09 Thread Rodion Efremov
Hello, I am interested in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8143850 Is there a way for becoming an assignee for the above issue? If yes, how do I proceed and what is the schedule? Best regards, rodde la 9.7.2022 klo 22.33 Tagir Valeev kirjoitti: > Note that nobody these days cares about Lin

Re: JMH results for IndexedLinkedList

2022-07-09 Thread John Hendrikx
I think there might be room for another List implementation in the JDK, one that fits in between ArrayList and LinkedHashMap. I've been looking for something to manage lists of listeners (which allow arbitrary removal), must be called in order, and should handle duplicates (at their respective

Re: JMH results for IndexedLinkedList

2022-07-09 Thread Tagir Valeev
Note that nobody these days cares about LinkedList. Use-cases where LinkedList outperforms careful use of ArrayList or ArrayDeque are next to none. So saying that your data structure is better than LinkedList is totally not a reason to add it to JDK. It should be better than ArrayList and ArrayDequ

Re: JMH results for IndexedLinkedList

2022-07-09 Thread Rodion Efremov
Hello, My benchmarking suggests, that, if nothing else, my IndexedLinkedList outperforms gracefully the java.util.LinkedList, so the use case should be the same (List + Deque -interfaces) for both of the aforementioned data structures. Best regards, rodde On Sat, Jul 9, 2022 at 11:19 AM Tagir V

Re: JMH results for IndexedLinkedList

2022-07-09 Thread Tagir Valeev
Hello! Are there real world problems/use cases where IndexedLinkedList would be preferred in terms of CPU/memory usage over ArrayList? сб, 9 июл. 2022 г., 07:18 Rodion Efremov : > Data structure repo: > https://github.com/coderodde/IndexedLinkedList > > Benchmark repo: > https://github.com/coder