On 20/08/2014 16:08, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
JDK 9 reviewers:
I would like to reprise this thread
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-August/028181.html
with an updated patch
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8054720
Patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb
On 22/08/2014 09:09, Wang Weijun wrote:
:
Great, this works for me.
But why does it need to be called in a doPrivileged() block? Isn't it only
about JDK-internal classes/resources?
It's a public API so it can be used by anyone. The question about
privileges and limiting them is a good quest
On 18/08/2014 22:12, Mike Duigou wrote:
On Aug 14 2014, at 06:39 , Alan Bateman wrote:
On 14/08/2014 14:23, Claes Redestad wrote:
How about methods only taking beginIndex? Integer.parseInt("x: 1000", 3,
10)? I guess these could to be dropped
to avoid ambiguity and instead allow for varia
On 25/08/2014 03:03, Wang Weijun wrote:
New webrevs updated
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8055723/core/webrev.00/
Includes modules java.base and security-related modules and the jarsigner
tool
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8055723/client/webrev.00
Includes the java.desktop mo
Hi friends of ByteArrayOutputStream,
I'm trying to clean up an apparent oversight when I tried to fix huge array
resizing back in
6933217: Huge arrays handled poorly in core libraries
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8055949
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk9/ByteArrayOut
On 25/08/2014 18:37, Martin Buchholz wrote:
Hi friends of ByteArrayOutputStream,
I'm trying to clean up an apparent oversight when I tried to fix huge
array resizing back in
6933217: Huge arrays handled poorly in core libraries
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8055949
http://cr.openjd
Thanks, Alan.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Alan Bateman
wrote:
> On 25/08/2014 18:37, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>
> Hi friends of ByteArrayOutputStream,
>
> I'm trying to clean up an apparent oversight when I tried to fix huge
> array resizing back in
> 6933217: Huge arrays handled poorly i
This looks fine to me as well.
I am fine with the @ignore as I don't suspect anyone would be able to sneak in
a change which removed the @ignore without anyone noticing and the comment for
why it is marked @ignore seems adequate.
Mike
On Aug 25 2014, at 13:28 , Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 25/08
On 2/08/2014 11:40 PM, Harshad RJ wrote:
Hi,
I hit this bug in my own application today:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042694
My app uses the h2 database which installs a shutdown hook. Works fine, but
while running with JNLP, the shutdown hook thrown an exception, probably
because
New webrevs available at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8055723/client/webrev.01/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8055723/core/webrev.01/
There are only 2 now. Everything non-client is in core.
Everyone, please do code review quickly because the patch touches too many
files and any
I was wondering, is it nice to address it in Java compiler to use string
builder for the string "+" operator?
Xuelei
On 8/26/2014 11:28 AM, Wang Weijun wrote:
> New webrevs available at
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8055723/client/webrev.01/
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/805
11 matches
Mail list logo
