There is a > 2/4G support issue we will need to address when using the
platform bundled zlib.
The total_in/total_out variables of z_stream_s is "long", which is not "big"
enough (32 bit) for ZIP64 support on a 32-bit platform. The zlib code
bundled with JDK has been updated to use "long long", as
On 30/11/2011 09:50, David Holmes wrote:
On 30/11/2011 7:43 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 30/11/2011 01:31, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 10:23 Tue 29 Nov , Alan Bateman wrote:
snip...
When we talked about the zlib version here (I think back in
February) we
talked about having the option to u
On 30/11/2011 7:43 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 30/11/2011 01:31, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 10:23 Tue 29 Nov , Alan Bateman wrote:
snip...
When we talked about the zlib version here (I think back in February) we
talked about having the option to use the system's zip library where
appropri
On 30/11/2011 01:31, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 10:23 Tue 29 Nov , Alan Bateman wrote:
snip...
When we talked about the zlib version here (I think back in February) we
talked about having the option to use the system's zip library where
appropriate. Have you given this any thought rec
On 29/11/2011 17:29, Xueming Shen wrote:
The test case has been updated accordingly to
(1) reduced the data size to 500k
(2) dialed down the loop iteration to 5
so it runs much faster now.
The webrev has been updated.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/7110149/webrev
Thanks, looks fine to
The test case has been updated accordingly to
(1) reduced the data size to 500k
(2) dialed down the loop iteration to 5
so it runs much faster now.
The webrev has been updated.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/7110149/webrev
-Sherman
On 11/29/2011 02:23 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 28/11/
That would be a separate RFE for that. As Mark suggested (as the
feedback for the
EFP) we now divide the zlib related work into small/separate rfes. To
use the platform
zlib is still on my list.
-Sherman
On 11/29/2011 06:05 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Am 29.11.2011 11:23, schrieb Alan Bateman:
When
Am 29.11.2011 11:23, schrieb Alan Bateman:
When we talked about the zlib version here (I think back in February) we talked about having the
option to use the system's zip library where appropriate. Have you given this any thought recently?
+1
Ulf
On 28/11/2011 22:06, Xueming Shen wrote:
Hi,
Here is the webrev for upgrading the bundled zlib from 1.2.3 to 1.2.5
for JDK8
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/7110149/webrev
The changes to the original zlib source code (other than the copyright
attachment)
is at
http://cr.openjdk.java.ne
The zlib-1.2.3 folder will be deleted. I did not list them in the
webrev. I should have mentioned in
the request.
-Sherman
On 11/28/2011 2:47 PM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Would zlib 1.2.3 remain in JDK8 repo alongside 1.2.5 ?
-Ulf
Am 28.11.2011 23:06, schrieb Xueming Shen:
Hi,
Here is the webrev f
Would zlib 1.2.3 remain in JDK8 repo alongside 1.2.5 ?
-Ulf
Am 28.11.2011 23:06, schrieb Xueming Shen:
Hi,
Here is the webrev for upgrading the bundled zlib from 1.2.3 to 1.2.5 for JDK8
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/7110149/webrev
The changes to the original zlib source code (other tha
Hi,
Here is the webrev for upgrading the bundled zlib from 1.2.3 to 1.2.5
for JDK8
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/7110149/webrev
The changes to the original zlib source code (other than the copyright
attachment)
is at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/7110149/webrev/src/share/native
12 matches
Mail list logo
