Hi Mandy,
On 10/04/2018 07:45 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 03/10/2018 18:28, Mandy Chung wrote:
:
On 10/3/18 9:30 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi Mandy,
I don't know if this matters though, but should
Reflection.getCallerClass() ever return null, previous behavior was
to throw NPE (from Reflect
On 03/10/2018 18:28, Mandy Chung wrote:
:
On 10/3/18 9:30 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi Mandy,
I don't know if this matters though, but should
Reflection.getCallerClass() ever return null, previous behavior was
to throw NPE (from Reflection.verifyMemberAccess(...)), now the
checks are skipp
On 10/3/18 9:30 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi Mandy,
I don't know if this matters though, but should
Reflection.getCallerClass() ever return null, previous behavior was to
throw NPE (from Reflection.verifyMemberAccess(...)), now the checks
are skipped. This should only be observable if [Class
Hi Mandy,
I don't know if this matters though, but should
Reflection.getCallerClass() ever return null, previous behavior was to
throw NPE (from Reflection.verifyMemberAccess(...)), now the checks are
skipped. This should only be observable if [Class,
Constructor].newInstance() was called fro
On 10/3/18 6:02 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 02/10/2018 20:33, Mandy Chung wrote:
Class::newInstance maintains its separate cache of the caller
class after access check. This leak has been there for a long
time and unnoticed.
This patch changes Class::newInstance to use the code path
for Co
On 02/10/2018 20:33, Mandy Chung wrote:
Class::newInstance maintains its separate cache of the caller
class after access check. This leak has been there for a long
time and unnoticed.
This patch changes Class::newInstance to use the code path
for Constructor::newInstance doing the access che
Class::newInstance maintains its separate cache of the caller
class after access check. This leak has been there for a long
time and unnoticed.
This patch changes Class::newInstance to use the code path
for Constructor::newInstance doing the access check and
caching the caller class. It will al