Hi Daniel and David,
Thanks for your opinions and for sharing more context - it is
definitely clearer now! I am glad that I reached out to the
mailing list first instead of going ahead with the changes! :)
Regards,
Sergei
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On F
Hi all,
Some tests use StringBuffers instead of StringBuilders where additional
thread-safety
is not required as e.g. in
test/jdk/sun/util/resources/TimeZone/Bug4640234.java:82 :
...
StringBuffer errors
=
new
StringBuffer(
""
);
StringBuffer warnings
=
new
StringBuffer(
""
);
...
Th
On 27/08/2021 8:42 pm, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Sergei,
I wouldn't bother replacing StringBuffers with StringDuilders in tests.
It seems a bit gratuitous - and possibly could complicate future
tests backports.
But that's my personal opinion. Others might disagree.
I agree with you. Complete was
Hi Sergei,
I wouldn't bother replacing StringBuffers with StringDuilders in tests.
It seems a bit gratuitous - and possibly could complicate future
tests backports.
But that's my personal opinion. Others might disagree.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 27/08/2021 11:00, Sergei Ustimenko wrote:
Hi
