Re: RFR: JDK-8281082: Improve javadoc references to JOSS [v2]

2022-02-01 Thread Alan Bateman
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 22:33:46 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote: >> The references to JOSS, the Java Object Serialization Specification, are not >> done consistently in the API javadoc. This should be improved. >> >> I'll update copyright years before pushing. > > Joe Darcy has updated the pull request increm

Re: RFR: JDK-8281082: Improve javadoc references to JOSS [v2]

2022-02-01 Thread Joe Darcy
> The references to JOSS, the Java Object Serialization Specification, are not > done consistently in the API javadoc. This should be improved. > > I'll update copyright years before pushing. Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision

Re: RFR: JDK-8281082: Improve javadoc references to JOSS

2022-02-01 Thread Lance Andersen
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 21:11:39 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote: > The references to JOSS, the Java Object Serialization Specification, are not > done consistently in the API javadoc. This should be improved. > > I'll update copyright years before pushing. Marked as reviewed by lancea (Reviewer). --

Re: RFR: JDK-8281082: Improve javadoc references to JOSS

2022-02-01 Thread Naoto Sato
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 21:11:39 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote: > The references to JOSS, the Java Object Serialization Specification, are not > done consistently in the API javadoc. This should be improved. > > I'll update copyright years before pushing. Marked as reviewed by naoto (Reviewer). ---

Re: RFR: JDK-8281082: Improve javadoc references to JOSS

2022-02-01 Thread Roger Riggs
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 21:11:39 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote: > The references to JOSS, the Java Object Serialization Specification, are not > done consistently in the API javadoc. This should be improved. > > I'll update copyright years before pushing. Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer). --

Re: RFR: JDK-8281082: Improve javadoc references to JOSS

2022-02-01 Thread Iris Clark
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 21:11:39 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote: > The references to JOSS, the Java Object Serialization Specification, are not > done consistently in the API javadoc. This should be improved. > > I'll update copyright years before pushing. Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).