On Sep 10, 2013, at 4:34 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 14:35, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> On Sep 6, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>
>>> :
>>> The comments are very educational as the resizing is difficult to
>>> completely grok without going through examples on a whiteboard. Anyw
On 09/09/2013 14:35, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On Sep 6, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
:
The comments are very educational as the resizing is difficult to completely
grok without going through examples on a whiteboard. Anyway, I don't see
anything obviously wrong after going through it. The
On Sep 9, 2013, at 3:35 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>
> On Sep 6, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
>> On 06/09/2013 12:08, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>>> On Sep 2, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>>>
>>> :
>>>
Here is the fix in the lambda repo which can be applied to tl:
ht
On Sep 6, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 06/09/2013 12:08, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> On Sep 2, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>>
>> :
>>
>>> Here is the fix in the lambda repo which can be applied to tl:
>>>
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/lambda/lambda/jdk/rev/b73937e96ae0
>>>
On 09/06/2013 04:56 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 06/09/2013 12:08, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On Sep 2, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
:
Here is the fix in the lambda repo which can be applied to tl:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/lambda/lambda/jdk/rev/b73937e96ae0
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/lambda
On 06/09/2013 12:08, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On Sep 2, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
:
Here is the fix in the lambda repo which can be applied to tl:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/lambda/lambda/jdk/rev/b73937e96ae0
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/lambda/lambda/jdk/raw-rev/b73937e96ae0
Anyone
On 06/09/2013 12:08, Paul Sandoz wrote:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/lambda/lambda/jdk/rev/b73937e96ae0
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/lambda/lambda/jdk/raw-rev/b73937e96ae0
Anyone up for reviewing this?
I skimmed the patch and nothing jumps out at me.
There does appear to be some code
On Sep 2, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>
> On Sep 2, 2013, at 1:18 PM, Doug Lea wrote:
>
>> On 08/28/2013 09:13 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
>>> On 08/28/2013 12:10 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hi,
Intermittent failures were reported with the CHM toArray test in the JDK.
>>
On Sep 2, 2013, at 1:18 PM, Doug Lea wrote:
> On 08/28/2013 09:13 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
>> On 08/28/2013 12:10 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Intermittent failures were reported with the CHM toArray test in the JDK.
>>>
>>> I updated the tests to increase the number of runs and the n
On 08/28/2013 09:13 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
On 08/28/2013 12:10 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hi,
Intermittent failures were reported with the CHM toArray test in the JDK.
I updated the tests to increase the number of runs and the number of workers
and i can reliably reproduce on my laptop, see below
On Aug 29, 2013, at 1:44 PM, Doug Lea wrote:
> On 08/28/2013 09:13 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
>
>> It seems that the iteration can traverse through the same tables multiple
>> times
>> (back and forth) by following ForwardingNode.nextTable links. Aren't
>> nextTable
>> links supposed to be only
On 08/28/2013 09:13 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
It seems that the iteration can traverse through the same tables multiple times
(back and forth) by following ForwardingNode.nextTable links. Aren't nextTable
links supposed to be only in "forward" direction, leading to from smaller to
larger tables?
On 08/28/2013 12:10 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hi,
Intermittent failures were reported with the CHM toArray test in the JDK.
I updated the tests to increase the number of runs and the number of workers
and i can reliably reproduce on my laptop, see below.
The test presumes the size should always
On 08/28/2013 06:10 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hi,
Intermittent failures were reported with the CHM toArray test in the JDK.
I updated the tests to increase the number of runs and the number of workers
and i can reliably reproduce on my laptop, see below.
The test presumes the size should always
14 matches
Mail list logo
