Re: RFR 8132964 Spliterator documentation on Priority(Blocking)Queue

2016-11-21 Thread Chris Hegarty
> On 21 Nov 2016, at 20:57, Martin Buchholz wrote: > > Looks good to me! +1 -Chris. > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Paul Sandoz > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please review specification clarifications to PriorityQueue and >> PriorityBlockingQueue for the spliterator. Ordinarily i would not s

Re: RFR 8132964 Spliterator documentation on Priority(Blocking)Queue

2016-11-21 Thread Doug Lea
On 11/21/2016 03:52 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote: Hi, Please review specification clarifications to PriorityQueue and PriorityBlockingQueue for the spliterator. Ordinarily i would not specify what spliterator characteristics are not reported, but in this case given what is said about iterator I thin

Re: RFR 8132964 Spliterator documentation on Priority(Blocking)Queue

2016-11-21 Thread Martin Buchholz
Looks good to me! On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote: > Hi, > > Please review specification clarifications to PriorityQueue and > PriorityBlockingQueue for the spliterator. Ordinarily i would not specify > what spliterator characteristics are not reported, but in this case given

RFR 8132964 Spliterator documentation on Priority(Blocking)Queue

2016-11-21 Thread Paul Sandoz
Hi, Please review specification clarifications to PriorityQueue and PriorityBlockingQueue for the spliterator. Ordinarily i would not specify what spliterator characteristics are not reported, but in this case given what is said about iterator I think it reasonable to say it about spliterator (