On 05/10/2016 10:50 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 9 May 2016, at 20:43, Richard Opalka wrote:
Fixed in JBoss Marshalling upstream.
Thanks for fixing this, and getting back to us on the list.
I assume then that, at least, this part of JBoss is working on JDK 9 b115,
right?
Yes.
Rio
-Chris
On 9 May 2016, at 20:43, Richard Opalka wrote:
> Fixed in JBoss Marshalling upstream.
Thanks for fixing this, and getting back to us on the list.
I assume then that, at least, this part of JBoss is working on JDK 9 b115,
right?
-Chris.
> Thanks,
>
> Rio
>
> On 04/27/2016 11:54 PM, Chris H
Fixed in JBoss Marshalling upstream.
Thanks,
Rio
On 04/27/2016 11:54 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Hi Rio,
We are missing sun/reflect/ReflectionFactory$GetReflectionFactoryAction inner
class
in jdk.unsupported module:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
sun/reflect/ReflectionFactory$GetReflectio
Hi Rio,
> We are missing sun/reflect/ReflectionFactory$GetReflectionFactoryAction inner
> class
>
> in jdk.unsupported module:
>
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> sun/reflect/ReflectionFactory$GetReflectionFactoryAction
>at
> jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(java.base@9
We are missing sun/reflect/ReflectionFactory$GetReflectionFactoryAction
inner class
in jdk.unsupported module:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
sun/reflect/ReflectionFactory$GetReflectionFactoryAction
at
jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(java.base@9-internal/BuiltinClassLoad
This change has been pushed to jdk9/dev. The hotspot gatekeeper
will bring it down into the hotspot forests.
-Chris.
> On 7 Apr 2016, at 18:14, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
> Enough technical debt has been paid down that we can now create the new
> JDK-specific module as proposed by JEP 260 [1], name
> On Apr 8, 2016, at 8:35 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
>
> I moved the tests from a directory named 'jdk.unsupported' to
> unsupported', as other tests, in test/tools/jdeps/module, use
> test/tools/jdeps as a test library, and the directory/test lib
> name is conflicting with the module name. jtr
On 08/04/16 03:52, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Apr 7, 2016, at 10:14 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Enough technical debt has been paid down that we can now create the new
JDK-specific module as proposed by JEP 260 [1], named jdk.unsupported.
This module will initially contain, and export, the sun.misc p
On 07/04/16 19:57, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 07/04/2016 18:14, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Enough technical debt has been paid down that we can now create the new
JDK-specific module as proposed by JEP 260 [1], named jdk.unsupported.
This module will initially contain, and export, the sun.misc package,
an
On 08/04/2016 15:31, Peter Levart wrote:
Will jdk.unsupported be "required public" by java.se?
No because jdk.* are JDK-specific and should never be required by
standard modules.
Will you have to explicitly -addmodule jdk.unsupported for class-path
programs too?
It exports an API and the
On 08/04/16 15:31, Peter Levart wrote:
On 04/08/2016 12:24 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On 7 Apr 2016, at 19:14, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Enough technical debt has been paid down that we can now create the new
JDK-specific module as proposed by JEP 260 [1], named jdk.unsupported.
This module will init
On 04/08/2016 12:24 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On 7 Apr 2016, at 19:14, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Enough technical debt has been paid down that we can now create the new
JDK-specific module as proposed by JEP 260 [1], named jdk.unsupported.
This module will initially contain, and export, the sun.misc
> On 7 Apr 2016, at 19:14, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
> Enough technical debt has been paid down that we can now create the new
> JDK-specific module as proposed by JEP 260 [1], named jdk.unsupported.
> This module will initially contain, and export, the sun.misc package,
> and will eventually expor
> On Apr 7, 2016, at 10:14 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
> Enough technical debt has been paid down that we can now create the new
> JDK-specific module as proposed by JEP 260 [1], named jdk.unsupported.
> This module will initially contain, and export, the sun.misc package,
> and will eventually e
On 07/04/2016 18:14, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Enough technical debt has been paid down that we can now create the new
JDK-specific module as proposed by JEP 260 [1], named jdk.unsupported.
This module will initially contain, and export, the sun.misc package,
and will eventually export the sun.reflect
Enough technical debt has been paid down that we can now create the new
JDK-specific module as proposed by JEP 260 [1], named jdk.unsupported.
This module will initially contain, and export, the sun.misc package,
and will eventually export the sun.reflect package too ( once it has
been sanitized ).
16 matches
Mail list logo
