Finally submitted.
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Martin Buchholz
wrote:
> After a long delay, we are finally ready to try again to get in jsr166
> jdk10 integration wave 1.
>
> The set of changes has grown a lot over the past few months (too much?),
> and contains the usual hard-to-review tck
After a long delay, we are finally ready to try again to get in jsr166
jdk10 integration wave 1.
The set of changes has grown a lot over the past few months (too much?),
and contains the usual hard-to-review tck test improvements. Our
infrastructure for generating these commits has changed a lot
Non-thread-pool changes committed while we wait for thread-pool CCC.
Thanks!
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looks good.
>
> It’s trivial but we probably require a CCC for ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor
> calling out the NPE for null unit argument values, to clarify pool sizes of
> TPE, and to clarify that AbortPolicy default handler for
Hi,
Looks good.
It’s trivial but we probably require a CCC for ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor
calling out the NPE for null unit argument values, to clarify pool sizes of
TPE, and to clarify that AbortPolicy default handler for TPE *and* STPE. We are
not quite there yet with the CCC being open (so
OK, this wave is open for review again.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Martin Buchholz
wrote:
> Oops. Martin forgot to check ScheduledExecutorService, and there's some
> overlap in specs, which requires some rework.
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Martin Buchholz
> wrote:
>
>> First j
Oops. Martin forgot to check ScheduledExecutorService, and there's some
overlap in specs, which requires some rework.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Martin Buchholz
wrote:
> First jdk10 integration
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk10/jsr166-integration/
>
> Mostly focuse
First jdk10 integration
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk10/jsr166-integration/
Mostly focused on thread pools.
