On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 19:29:45 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> While it is strongly recommend to not use the default toString for a class,
>> at times it is the least-bad alternative. When that alternative needs to be
>> used, it would be helpful to have the implementation already available, such
>> as
On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 19:29:45 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> While it is strongly recommend to not use the default toString for a class,
>> at times it is the least-bad alternative. When that alternative needs to be
>> used, it would be helpful to have the implementation already available, such
>> as
> While it is strongly recommend to not use the default toString for a class,
> at times it is the least-bad alternative. When that alternative needs to be
> used, it would be helpful to have the implementation already available, such
> as in Objects.toDefaultString(). This method is analagous t
