Thanks Paul. :)
Best Regards
Adam Farley
IBM Runtimes
"Hohensee, Paul" wrote on 10/12/2019 20:16:31:
> From: "Hohensee, Paul"
> To: Severin Gehwolf , Adam Farley8
> , Java Core Libs
> Cc: jdk8u-dev
> Date: 10/12/2019 20:16
> Subject: [EXTERNAL]
Lgtm. I'll sponsor it and tag the JBS issue with jdk8u-fix-request.
Thanks,
Paul
On 12/9/19, 4:55 AM, "jdk-updates-dev on behalf of Severin Gehwolf"
wrote:
Hi Adam,
This looks like an RFR for OpenJDK 8u. Adding the appropriate mailing
list (jdk8u-dev not jdk-updates-dev; bcc
Hi All,
I'm asking for reviewers, sponsors, and opinions on the changes proposed
below.
Right now, there are four files in OpenJDK 8 that have a GPL V2 License,
with no Classpath Exception.
Based on the conversation so far, here's a summary of the proposed
actions:
1) Remove this file, along
n Weimer
> , jdk-updates-...@openjdk.java.net
> Date: 07/10/2019 13:58
> Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8227715: GPLv2 files missing Classpath Exception
>
> On 07/10/2019 13:51, Adam Farley8 wrote:
> :
> -- jdk/src/macosx/native/jobjc/JObjC.xcodeproj/default.pbxuser
> It might be simp
On 07/10/2019 13:51, Adam Farley8 wrote:
:
-- jdk/src/macosx/native/jobjc/JObjC.xcodeproj/default.pbxuser
It might be simpler to just get rid of the JObjC bits. If you dig
through the JDK 8 history then you should see that JObjC.jar was dropped
from the boot class path (it should never have bee
To: Adam Farley8
> Cc: Java Core Libs , Florian Weimer
> , jdk-updates-...@openjdk.java.net
> Date: 04/10/2019 17:29
> Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8227715: GPLv2 files missing Classpath Exception
>
> Hi Adam,
> Someone familiar with the history and usage of these files needs to
&g
oring the change?
Best Regards
Adam Farley
IBM Runtimes
Joe Darcy wrote on 03/10/2019 23:30:14:
> From: Joe Darcy
> To: Florian Weimer , Adam Farley8
> Cc: jdk-updates-...@openjdk.java.net, Java Core Libs d...@openjdk.java.net>
> Date: 03/10/2019 23:32
> Subject: Re: RFR: J
Core Libs d...@openjdk.java.net>
> Date: 03/10/2019 23:32
> Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8227715: GPLv2 files missing Classpath Exception
>
> It is customary to have the license of a file be updated from someone
> affiliated with the copyright holder of the file.
>
> -Joe
&
BM Runtimes
Florian Weimer wrote on 03/10/2019 21:42:52:
> From: Florian Weimer
> To: Adam Farley8
> Cc: "Java Core Libs" , jdk-updates-
> d...@openjdk.java.net
> Date: 03/10/2019 21:43
> Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8227715: GPLv2 files missing Classpath Exception
>
It is customary to have the license of a file be updated from someone
affiliated with the copyright holder of the file.
-Joe
On 10/3/2019 1:42 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Adam Farley8:
Four GPLv2 files in 8u seem to be missing the classpath exception from the
copyright section.
Requesting r
* Adam Farley8:
> Four GPLv2 files in 8u seem to be missing the classpath exception from the
> copyright section.
>
> Requesting reviews and a sponsor.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227715
>
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~afarley/8227715/webrev/
All these files are no
Hi Adam,
This looks like an RFR for OpenJDK 8u. Adding the appropriate mailing
list (jdk8u-dev not jdk-updates-dev; bcc'ed the latter) and fixing the
subject line.
Thanks,
Severin
On Thu, 2019-10-03 at 15:53 +0100, Adam Farley8 wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Four GPLv2 files in 8u seem to be missing the
Hey all,
Four GPLv2 files in 8u seem to be missing the classpath exception from the
copyright section.
Requesting reviews and a sponsor.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227715
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~afarley/8227715/webrev/
Best Regards
Adam Farley
IBM Runtimes
U
13 matches
Mail list logo
