I have updated the CSR after some feedback, please take a look at it. I
have added some comments to the bug entry describing the last changes
Thanks,
Vicente
On 11/4/19 3:54 PM, Vicente Romero wrote:
Hi,
Please review the draft of the CSR for Core-libs support for records
at [1]
Thanks,
Vi
> On 4 Nov 2019, at 23:22, Joe Darcy wrote:
> ...
> It isn't unreasonable for java.lang.Record to make some mention of the
> special treatment by serialization. (As a point of reference, java.lang.Enum
> does *not* reference the special handling of enums of serialization.)
>
> I think a refe
> On 4 Nov 2019, at 21:27, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> ...
> Right now, it appears to be possible to have a record implement
> java.io.Serializable, and serialization will appear to work, but
> because the names of the implicitly generated private fields are not
> specified, it is not portable a
Hello,
On 11/4/2019 1:27 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Vicente Romero:
Please review the draft of the CSR for Core-libs support for records at [1]
Thanks,
Vicente
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233436
I would have expected something regarding serialization in the
description of
* Vicente Romero:
> Please review the draft of the CSR for Core-libs support for records at [1]
>
> Thanks,
> Vicente
>
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233436
I would have expected something regarding serialization in the
description of java.lang.Record.
Right now, it appears to
Hi,
Please review the draft of the CSR for Core-libs support for records at [1]
Thanks,
Vicente
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233436
