On Tue, 11 May 2021 10:19:52 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> For correctness (and peace of mind)- we should probably introduce a local
> variable in all the places where `sink` is read more than once outside of a
> synchronized block
Done, thanks!
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jd
On Tue, 11 May 2021 15:47:37 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
>> 8266857: PipedOutputStream.sink should be volatile
>
> Liam Miller-Cushon has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and
> previous commits have been removed. The incremental views will show
> differences compared to the previ
> 8266857: PipedOutputStream.sink should be volatile
Liam Miller-Cushon has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and
previous commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences
compared to the previous content of the PR. The pull request contains one new
commit since
On Mon, 10 May 2021 23:25:46 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
> 8266857: PipedOutputStream.sink should be volatile
For correctness (and peace of mind)- we should probably introduce a local
variable in all the places where `sink` is read more than once outside of a
synchronized block (the two `wr
8266857: PipedOutputStream.sink should be volatile
-
Commit messages:
- 8266857: PipedOutputStream.sink should be volatile
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3960/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=3960&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.jav
