Hi Claes,
thanks a lot, and I agree with the renaming.
Best,
Michael
> Am 02.03.2016 um 13:59 schrieb Claes Redestad :
>
> Hi,
>
> this looks good to me.
>
> Maybe rename LoopTest to LoopCombinatorTest to add a bit of specificity?
>
> /Claes
>
> On 2016-03-02 13:46, Michael Haupt wrote:
>>
Hi,
this looks good to me.
Maybe rename LoopTest to LoopCombinatorTest to add a bit of specificity?
/Claes
On 2016-03-02 13:46, Michael Haupt wrote:
Dear all,
please review this change.
RFE: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8150832
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mhaupt/8150832/w
Dear all,
please review this change.
RFE: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8150832
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mhaupt/8150832/webrev.00
This is a refactoring; the monolithic test for JEP 274 was split into several
tests along functionality covered. Also, data providers and other