Wow, that's indeed much better, than my simple whitespace correction.
Looks good. I guess the doc corrections are still in process.
My old patch may help to locate them:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/attachment.cgi?id=146
-Ulf
Am 26.03.2010 00:37, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
Hi Masayoshi and Ulf
Hi Masayoshi and Ulf,
I'd like you to do a code review.
There are actual doc bugs in the specification
of the surrogate unicode blocks.
Ulf convinced me that we should use U+ notation for
Unicode blocks.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk7/UnicodeBlock/
Martin
