On 04/18/11 11:18 AM, Doug Lea wrote:
On 04/13/11 11:58, Chris Hegarty wrote:
This change does appear worthwhile. We have a narrowing window of
opportunity
for JDK7. I spoke to Alan Bateman about this and we feel that if we could
finalize the JDK7 changes by next Monday (that is, get them in f
On 04/13/11 11:58, Chris Hegarty wrote:
This change does appear worthwhile. We have a narrowing window of opportunity
for JDK7. I spoke to Alan Bateman about this and we feel that if we could
finalize the JDK7 changes by next Monday (that is, get them in for JDK7 b140),
this would give us a reaso
Chris Hegarty wrote:
Doug,
This change does appear worthwhile. We have a narrowing window of
opportunity for JDK7. I spoke to Alan Bateman about this and we feel
that if we could finalize the JDK7 changes by next Monday (that is,
get them in for JDK7 b140), this would give us a reasonable tim
Doug,
This change does appear worthwhile. We have a narrowing window of
opportunity for JDK7. I spoke to Alan Bateman about this and we feel
that if we could finalize the JDK7 changes by next Monday (that is, get
them in for JDK7 b140), this would give us a reasonable time for them to
soak be
Members of this list are also invited to check this out.
I'm not sure if it will make Java7 schedule, but the
improvements seem worthwhile given the increased
use of ConcurrentHashMap inside the JDK (including
multiple tables per class loader in JDK7.)
-Doug
Original Message
