Re: Embedded HTTP server

2008-06-19 Thread Michael McMahon
David M. Lloyd wrote: On 06/18/2008 11:03 AM, Christopher Hegarty - Sun Microsystems Ireland wrote: I think that this thread should be moved to the net-dev alias. I know that Michael is certainly a member of net-dev and is currently the owner of the HTTP server. OK, great. To restate the or

Re: Embedded HTTP server

2008-06-18 Thread David M. Lloyd
On 06/18/2008 11:03 AM, Christopher Hegarty - Sun Microsystems Ireland wrote: I think that this thread should be moved to the net-dev alias. I know that Michael is certainly a member of net-dev and is currently the owner of the HTTP server. OK, great. To restate the original subject of this

Re: Embedded HTTP server

2008-06-18 Thread Alan Bateman
David M. Lloyd wrote: Is Michael presently in charge of this piece of software from Sun's perspective? Is he subscribed to this list? I've cc'ed the networking group as that is where he HTTP server is maintained. Micahel is a member of that group. It may be worth re-sending your original prop

Re: Embedded HTTP server

2008-06-18 Thread Christopher Hegarty - Sun Microsystems Ireland
I think that this thread should be moved to the net-dev alias. I know that Michael is certainly a member of net-dev and is currently the owner of the HTTP server. -Chris. David M. Lloyd wrote: On 05/27/2008 02:15 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: Juha Lindfors wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 7:03 P

Re: Embedded HTTP server

2008-06-18 Thread David M. Lloyd
On 05/27/2008 02:15 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: Juha Lindfors wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 7:03 PM, David M. Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: If not... does anyone besides me think this is a good idea? I think it would be a great idea... the only reason I've

Re: Embedded HTTP server

2008-05-27 Thread Alan Bateman
Juha Lindfors wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 7:03 PM, David M. Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: If not... does anyone besides me think this is a good idea? I think it would be a great idea... the only reason I've shied away from using the current embedded

Re: Embedded HTTP server

2008-05-27 Thread David M. Lloyd
On 05/27/2008 01:29 PM, Juha Lindfors wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 7:03 PM, David M. Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If not... does anyone besides me think this is a good idea? I think it would be a great idea... the only reason I've shied away from using the current embedded one is its

Re: Embedded HTTP server

2008-05-27 Thread Juha Lindfors
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 7:03 PM, David M. Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If not... does anyone besides me think this is a good idea? > I think it would be a great idea... the only reason I've shied away from using the current embedded one is its unclear status in the com.sun.* package. --

Embedded HTTP server

2008-05-27 Thread David M. Lloyd
Is there an effort underway to produce a JSR for adding an embedded HTTP server (like the one currently in OpenJDK under the com.sun.net.httpserver) to the JDK (under e.g. javax.net.httpserver or similar)? If not... does anyone besides me think this is a good idea? - DML