On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 14:24, Ulf Zibis wrote:
> Am 17.03.2010 20:12, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:02, Ulf Zibis wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Additionally I think, there's a bug in javadoc of those methods.
>>> Actually they throw StringIndexOutOfBoundsException.
>>>
>>
>> Why
Am 17.03.2010 20:12, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:02, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Additionally I think, there's a bug in javadoc of those methods.
Actually they throw StringIndexOutOfBoundsException.
Why would that be a bug?
I think, javadoc should indicate StringI
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:02, Ulf Zibis wrote:
> Am 17.03.2010 18:41, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 08:29, Ulf Zibis wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Why there are 2 methods which do not use the super method, where I can't
>>> see
>>> any difference? :
>>>
>>> public synchronized ch
Am 17.03.2010 18:41, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 08:29, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Why there are 2 methods which do not use the super method, where I can't see
any difference? :
public synchronized char charAt(int index)
public synchronized void setCharAt(int index, char
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 08:29, Ulf Zibis wrote:
> Why there are 2 methods which do not use the super method, where I can't see
> any difference? :
>
> public synchronized char charAt(int index)
> public synchronized void setCharAt(int index, char ch)
You're correct that these methods
could
Am 17.03.2010 17:36, schrieb Rémi Forax:
Le 17/03/2010 17:29, Ulf Zibis a écrit :
Why there are 2 methods which do not use the super method, where I
can't see any difference? :
public synchronized char charAt(int index)
public synchronized void setCharAt(int index, char ch)
Wouldn't e
Le 17/03/2010 17:29, Ulf Zibis a écrit :
Why there are 2 methods which do not use the super method, where I
can't see any difference? :
public synchronized char charAt(int index)
public synchronized void setCharAt(int index, char ch)
Wouldn't ensureCapacity better coded as follows? :
Why there are 2 methods which do not use the super method, where I can't
see any difference? :
public synchronized char charAt(int index)
public synchronized void setCharAt(int index, char ch)
Wouldn't ensureCapacity better coded as follows? :
public void ensureCapacity(int minimumC
