Typically JavaBeans changes went into Swing (now AWT) gate. I don't
think this really matter where to push this time assuming the changes
will be propagated to AWT repo in a few weeks.
Thanks,
Andrey.
On 12/1/2011 9:04 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 01/12/2011 16:33, Maurizio Cimadamore w
On 02/12/11 10:31, Sergey Malenkov wrote:
I approve changes with a small update.
java/beans/VetoableChangeSupport.java:
-Hashtable children =
(Hashtable) fields.get("children", null);
+@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
+Hashtable children =
(Hashtable)fields.get("childre
Changeset: 89130611b178
Author:mcimadamore
Date: 2011-12-01 18:34 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/89130611b178
7116954: Misc warnings in java.beans/java.beans.context
Summary: Remove generic warnings form java.beans and java.beans.context
Reviewed-by: alanb
On 01/12/11 17:13, Andrey Pikalev wrote:
Typically JavaBeans changes went into Swing (now AWT) gate. I don't
think this really matter where to push this time assuming the changes
will be propagated to AWT repo in a few weeks.
I'm thinking to push the changeset to TL - if you feel otherwise pleas
On 01/12/2011 16:33, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
Updated version [1].
Changes:
*) Beans.java:184 - generified PrivilegedAction
*) Beans.java:284 - generified PrivilegedAction
*) NameGenerator.java:108 - changed Object to Integer and removed
following cast
*) Introspector.java: added new fake lo
Updated version [1].
Changes:
*) Beans.java:184 - generified PrivilegedAction
*) Beans.java:284 - generified PrivilegedAction
*) NameGenerator.java:108 - changed Object to Integer and removed
following cast
*) Introspector.java: added new fake local variable to reduce scope of
@SuppressWarning
Looks good.
Trivially,
- NameGenerator.java L108
'size' could be an Integer and avoid subsequent cast.
- SimpleBeanInfo.java L121,
< PrivilegedAction
---
> PrivilegedAction
-Chris.
On 01/12/2011 15:07, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
Hi,
I tried to cleanup as many warnings as p
On 01/12/2011 15:07, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
Hi,
I tried to cleanup as many warnings as possible in
java.beans/java.beans.context [1]. There were a few places (esp. in
java.beans.context) in which I had to suppress rawtypes warnings as
the raw types were in method signatures of what looked
Hi,
I tried to cleanup as many warnings as possible in
java.beans/java.beans.context [1]. There were a few places (esp. in
java.beans.context) in which I had to suppress rawtypes warnings as the
raw types were in method signatures of what looked like public API.
Feedback welcome.
[1] - http:
