Thank you Paul. I was told maybe we will target this on 8u20 if we can't catch
8. Let's do the open review first.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tyan/JDK-8033358/webrev.02/
Fibonacci:
Update as you suggested. Test shows parallel version is faster than sequential
version when the input is greater
Hi Paul
I know this may be a little bit late. But I am still asking you review this.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tyan/JDK-8033358/webrev.01/
This is a whole demo code include the stream demo code you reviewed before also
included parallel part. There is one other parallel demo that Paul has alre
Thank you Paul
There is one minor question, I can't compile one of your code, then I realized
that's because grouping by signature is public static
Collector> groupingBy(Function
classifier, Collector downstream)
Which makes me wonder why we need type A here, why we don't use variant here
Also there is one more question I missed
You suggested ""ParallelCore" is not a very descriptive name. Suggest
"streams"."
1) yes we agree this demo is not for parallel computation per se
2) but we do not have a clear demo for parallel computation
3) if we are to rename this, we need to develop a
Hi Paul
you have comments "suggest that all streams are sequential. There is an
inconsistency in the use and in some cases it is embedded in other stream
usages."
We do not really understand what exactly is meant, could you elaborate a little
bit. Is it because we want to show ppl that we shoul
