Eamonn McManus wrote:
> I can act as sponsor for this change.
Excellent, thanks Eamonn.
> Can you say a bit more about the rationale here? I understand why
> SPIs should be defined with abstract classes rather than interfaces,
> but ServiceLoader already supports both classes and interfaces.
I w
Dne Wednesday 22 October 2008 18:55:03 Eamonn McManus napsal(a):
> Jaroslav,
>
> I can act as sponsor for this change.
Excellent. I'll prepare better description of the change over the weekend.
Thanks.
-jst
>
> My understanding from looking at the code is that the change is as follows.
> Today
Jaroslav,
I can act as sponsor for this change.
My understanding from looking at the code is that the change is as
follows. Today, you can supply an implementation of the SPI
com.example.Foo by putting a jar file in the classpath (etc) that
contains a file called META-INF/services/com.example.
Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
OK, so now, after Mark's reply, we know that it is possible to include such
little, compatible extensions of an existing APIs into the Maintenance JSR.
Good. Now please tell me, what shall I do to make it happen[1]?
Will Mark or someone else from core-libs@ do a technical
OK, so now, after Mark's reply, we know that it is possible to include such
little, compatible extensions of an existing APIs into the Maintenance JSR.
Good. Now please tell me, what shall I do to make it happen[1]?
Will Mark or someone else from core-libs@ do a technical review of my patch?
By wh
Thanks for the clarification, Mark. I've heard about some umbrella JSR for
each release of the JDK before and I was hoping that my proposed change
could be covered as part of it. Thanks for confirming that such aggregation
is possible.
> With regard to this particular proposal, as the original au
> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:56:13 +1000
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If this is a modification to the API not just a patch for the
> implementation then the short answer is No.
Well, not exactly.
> API changes have to be made
> via a JSR.
... or in a M
Hi Jaroslav,
If this is a modification to the API not just a patch for the
implementation then the short answer is No. API changes have to be made
via a JSR.
David Holmes
On 17/10/08 03:38 AM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
Hi.
I can imagine, dear core-libs members, that you are all busy with your
Hi.
I can imagine, dear core-libs members, that you are all busy with your jobs,
however at least give me hope: Can I get my patch into the OpenJDK in
reasonable timeframe or not?
Thanks in advance for your reply.
-jst
Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
> Proposal: Enhance ServiceLoader to understand factor
Proposal: Enhance ServiceLoader to understand factory methods
Justification: A lot of our services in NetBeans are final classes. Still,
we
would like to use the META-INF/services registration to register their
providers. Currently this does not work, we either need to unfinalize the
classes (w
10 matches
Mail list logo
