Sorry, just a reminder. If the activity is untimely, then could you
please review the following minimum part of fix?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8138838/webrev.min.00/index.html
(some misprints + midget JDK-8138893 fixed).
Thanks,
Alexander
On 10/5/2015 2:12 PM, Alexander Stepanov
Sorry; wrong subject...
On 10/5/2015 2:12 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8138838
Patch + webrev zipped + specdiff report:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8138838
Just some cosmetic changes for docs
ese changes are desired at all for now.
Thanks,
Alexander
(Just in case, adding the prehistory and sending a copy to core-libs-dev).
On 10/1/2015 2:31 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello Martin, Stuart,
Thank you for the notes,
Yes, the initial utility is quite ugly, I just tried to prepare it
d to go to the
external workspace at the same time for the technology so these should
definitely be kept separate.
Best
Lance
On Oct 1, 2015, at 7:31 AM, Alexander Stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:
So if you don't have objections, I'll delay
("", tag2);
Why not use case-insensitive regex?
Here's an emacs-lisp one-liner I've been known to use:
(defun tt-code ()
(interactive)
(query-replace-regexp
"<\\(tt\\|code\\)>\\([^&<>]+\\)" &
,
Alexander
On 9/27/2015 4:52 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello Martin,
Here is some simple app. to replace tags with a new-style {@code
} one (which is definitely not so elegant as the Perl one-liners):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/tmp/codeTags/SimpleTagEditor.java
Corresponding patch
e the web page):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133651/jdk.00/index.html
Thanks,
Alexander
P.S. The replacement job is mostly (I guess, ~80%) complete. But
probably this approach should be used if some similar replacement task
for, e.g., tags would be planned in future (there are
thousa
> It's probably correct, but I would have left it out of this change
Yes, I see. Reverted (please update the web page):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133651/jdk.00/index.html
Thanks,
Alexander
P.S. The replacement job is mostly (I guess, ~80%) complete. But
probably this approach
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133651/jdk.00/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133651/jaxws.00/index.html
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133651
Just another portion of deprecated (and ) tags replaced with
{@code }. Som
Thanks!
Regards,
Alexander
On 9/13/2015 7:10 PM, Lance Andersen wrote:
I did not see any issues looking at the udiffs. I assume based on
your specdiff comment this should be good to go
On Sep 13, 2015, at 11:25 AM, Alexander Stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrot
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133650/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133650
Just another portion of deprecated tags replaced with {@code }.
A single (expected) change was indicated by specdiff (in ORB.java).
Th
dersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering
1 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 18, 2015, at 7:50 AM, Alexander Stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@ora
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8132478/jdk.00/index.html
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8132478/jaxws.00/index.html
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8132478
Just a minor fix for docs (a few tidy warnings + some invalid tags
Thanks!
Regards,
Alexander
On 8/13/2015 8:42 PM, Lance Andersen wrote:
looks OK. Nothing obvious stands out.
Best
Lance
On Aug 13, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Alexander Stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133480/webrev.00
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133480
Just another portion of deprecated tags replaced with {@code }.
A single misprint was fixed; no other changes indicated by specdiff.
Tha
Hello Lance,
Thanks!
Regards,
Alexander
On 8/12/2015 7:41 PM, Lance Andersen wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Nothing seems amiss in the changes and you indicated the specdiff
shows no issues so you should be good to go
Best
Lance
On Aug 12, 2015, at 11:46 AM, Alexander Stepanov
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133459/webrev.00/index.html
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133459
Just a next portion of deprecated '' tags replaced (didn't touch all
these multiple ' 's to avoid undesirable formatting chang
Thanks!
Regards,
Alexander
On 8/11/2015 7:10 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
Thanks! Looks good to me.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Alexander Stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hello Martin,
the changes were reverted for the following files:
gable*.java
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Alexander Stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133188/webrev.01
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eavstepan/8133188/w
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133188/webrev.01
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133188
Just a next portion of "" tags removed.
specdiff report:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133188/specdiff.util/overview-summary.html
Thanks!
On 8/6/2015 6:33 PM, Lance Andersen wrote:
Looks fine
Best
Lance
On Aug 6, 2015, at 11:08 AM, Alexander Stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133115/webrev.
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133115/webrev.00
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133115
Just a next portion of "" tags removed.
specdiffs did not detect any changes for java.util package:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/
Hello Daniel,
Thanks!
Regards,
Alexander
On 8/6/2015 1:14 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Cursory inspection of the patch file has not revealed anything wrong.
Specdiff looks OK, so that's good for me.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 05/08/15 19:37, Alexander Stepanov
t look at other files; I'm presuming that others have.)
s'marks
On 8/5/15 5:01 AM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello Stuart,
Please see the final version of File.java (please update the page) -
just
replacing with in the mentioned places:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/813246
> javax.management - one (expected) change in TabularDataSupport:
(full package diff:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133040/javax.management/overview-summary.html)
On 8/5/2015 8:22 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix:
h
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133040/webrev.00
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133040
specdiffs:
java.lang.management - no changes detected:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133040/java.lang.management/overview-summary.
s there merely for
typographical purposes. I suspect that after you restore the italic
'f' it'll look bad, so you'll want to restore the as well.
s'marks
On 8/3/15 9:03 AM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello Pavel
> Hi Alexander, if I were you I would run specdiff
Th
Thanks!
On 8/5/2015 11:14 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Alexander,
On 04/08/15 19:34, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello Daniel,
The review was re-uploaded as specdiff indeed discovered a couple of
unwanted changes (in 'InitialContext' and 'ReferralException'), so your
and Pav
32877/webrev.01/jdk.patch, and
there's nothing that caught my eye.
However - it would be good if you could generate a specdiff so that
we could verify that no mistake has crept in.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 03/08/15 17:39, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
just in case, the updated webrev:
http:/
penjdk.java.net/jeps/224 (but it is outside of my competence,
sorry).
Regards,
Alexander
On 8/3/2015 8:02 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
I'm surprised is going away. Do you have a reference that
explains the new jdk9 javadoc standards?
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:43 AM
On 8/3/2015 6:33 PM, Pavel Rappo wrote:
On 3 Aug 2015, at 16:07, Alexander Stepanov
wrote:
Please see the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8132468/webrev.01/
removed wrapping around the links (mostly PrintStream.java,
PrintWriter.java, File.java), plus other changes
just in case, the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8132877/webrev.01/index.html
On 8/3/2015 4:01 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
P.S. I have also to replace {@link ...} with just {@link
...} in a couple of places here (as in the previous RFR 8132468...)
Regards,
Alexander
Please see the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8132468/webrev.01/
removed wrapping around the links (mostly
PrintStream.java, PrintWriter.java, File.java), plus other changes in
File.java
Thanks,
Alexander
On 8/3/2015 3:40 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello Daniel
P.S. I have also to replace {@link ...} with just {@link
...} in a couple of places here (as in the previous RFR 8132468...)
Regards,
Alexander
On 8/3/2015 3:57 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Thanks!
On 8/3/2015 3:53 PM, Lance Andersen wrote:
I think this looks ok also.
I agree with Daniel
Lance
On Aug 3, 2015, at 5:43 AM, Alexander Stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8132877/webrev.00/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eavstepan/8132877/webrev.00/>
<http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif&g
as the tag is deprecated
for HTML5, in contrast to the ). So the touched packages (and even
files) still have a lot of tags.
Thanks,
Alexander
On 8/3/2015 3:17 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
On 03/08/15 11:31, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix:
http://cr.op
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8132877/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8132877
Just some cleanup for docs (replacing obsolete "").
Thanks,
Alexander
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8132468/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8132468
Just some cleanup for docs (replacing obsolete "").
Thanks,
Alexander
Thanks!
On 01.07.2015 21:24, joe darcy wrote:
Hello,
Looks fine to me; thanks,
-Joe
On 7/1/2015 7:35 AM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8130247/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130247
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8130247/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130247
Just a minor correction for the docs. Some "empty trimming " tidy
warnings fixed; some deprecated "" tags were replaced with "{@code
}"
Thanks!
On 05.06.2015 21:32, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Looks good, thanks for the updates.
Roger
On 6/5/2015 1:33 PM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello Lance, Roger,
Thank you for the notes, please see the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8081517/webrev.01
e data.
*
*/
private transient Connection con;
3)
CachedRowSetWriter.java:
+1056: The tag "@ param" should be tighted up to "@param"
Thanks, Roger
On 6/5/2015 8:51 AM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/
r.java:
+1056: The tag "@ param" should be tighted up to "@param"
Thanks, Roger
On 6/5/2015 8:51 AM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8081517/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8081517
J
Hello,
Could you please review the fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8081517/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8081517
Just some cleanup for docs.
Thanks,
Alexander
Thanks!
On 26.05.2015 15:30, Lance Andersen wrote:
Hi Alexander,
the updates look fine as well
Best
Lance
On May 26, 2015, at 7:45 AM, alexander stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hello Lance,
Thank you.
> One suggestion for webrevs is to chang
der,
Overal this looks OK. One suggestion for webrevs is to change
to {@code} while you are updating specific comments (not
the entire file, but at least the lines you are touching).
Thank you for making the changes.
Best
Lance
On May 25, 2015, at 5:40 AM, alexander stepa
Hello,
Could you please review the fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8040147/webrev.02/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8040147
Just a minor fix for docs (some tidy warnings + misprints).
Thanks,
Alexander
,
Alexander
On 18.05.2015 18:54, Lance Andersen wrote:
The revised changes seem OK in addition to the previous webrev
Best
Lance
On May 18, 2015, at 11:36 AM, alexander stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hello Roger,
Fixed; please see
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/
s/sun/misc/resources/Messages_* files:
Thanks, Roger
On 5/18/2015 10:08 AM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Please see the updated webrev
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8080422/webrev.01/
- some misprints were fixed as well
(not 100% sure if "comparision" should be replaced with
Please see the updated webrev
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8080422/webrev.01/
- some misprints were fixed as well
(not 100% sure if "comparision" should be replaced with "comparison",
but the latter looks more suitable).
Thanks,
Alexander
On 15.05.2015 20:16, alex
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8080422/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8080422
Just some HTML markup fix.
The affected packages should (probably) not be visible in the new
modular system, but nevertheless...
Thank
:25, Lance Andersen wrote:
The changes seem reasonable those the comments in ValueBoxGen24 are
somewhat cryptic to me at least :-)
On May 5, 2015, at 12:30 PM, alexander stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:
> _variableName in the public javadocs
the code...
Thanks,
Alexander
On 05.05.2015 18:46, Lance Andersen wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Thank you, I guess I am not a fan of _variableName in the public
javadocs as it is not something we normally see.
Understand less is more, especially with CORBA.
On May 5, 2015, at 11:41 AM, alexander
But yes, for 'writeValue' it could be renamed without any thoughts,
thanks...
On 05.05.2015 18:41, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello Lance,
It just seemed to be less hazardous. E.g., method 'readValue' (in
ValueHandlerImpl) contains inner variable 'in' and par
s changing the @param tag to "_out" ?
Best,
lance
On May 5, 2015, at 11:21 AM, alexander stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8079342/webrev.00/
<http://cr.o
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8079342/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8079342
Just some HTML markup fix for CORBA.
Thanks,
Alexander
- part 1
Hi Alexander,
The improvements look good to me.
Thank you, Roger
On 4/30/2015 12:35 PM, alexander stepanov wrote:
> Hello Roger,
>
> Thank you for the notes; please see the updated webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8079075/webrev.01/
>
> Regards,
> Alexan
Hello,
Could you please review the fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8040147/webrev.01/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8040147
Just a very minor fix of docs markup.
Thanks,
Alexander
e any value in
the code anymore. It would probably be fine to just drop the extra
'<>' symbols.
And around the author initials.--> klr
Regards, Roger
On 4/30/2015 7:56 AM, alexander stepanov wrote:
P.S. Sorry, not sure if changes like "" -> "{@lite
P.S. Sorry, not sure if changes like "" -> "{@literal }"
(see, e.g., ValueBoxGen24.java) are what expected; please correct me if
I'm wrong.
But something should be done; otherwise "" is interpreted as an
unknown HTML tag causing the errors.
Thanks,
Ale
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8079075/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8079075
Just some HTML markup fix for CORBA.
Thanks,
Alexander
thanks!
On 28.04.2015 19:25, Lance Andersen wrote:
This seems better now :-)
On Apr 28, 2015, at 12:09 PM, alexander stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hello Roger,
Thanks!
> Generally, avoiding line breaks of {@link x} across lines makes
the sour
n 4/28/2015 8:22 AM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8076224/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076224
Just some HTML cleanup for docs (remove tidy warnings; remove some
unnecessary tags as t
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8076224/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076224
Just some HTML cleanup for docs (remove tidy warnings; remove some
unnecessary tags as they are not supported in HTML5).
Thanks,
Alex
Hello Lance,
Thanks!
Regards,
Alexander
On 24.04.2015 18:55, Lance Andersen wrote:
Hi Alexander
The changes seem fine
Best
Lance
On Apr 24, 2015, at 11:39 AM, alexander stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8078622/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078622
Just some HTML cleanup for docs.
Thanks,
Alexander
Thanks!
On 20.04.2015 18:10, Lance Andersen wrote:
Looks fine. Need to get this into the upstream project though so they
are not lost on the next update
Best
Lance
On Apr 20, 2015, at 11:01 AM, alexander stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hello,
Could y
Hello,
Could you please review the fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8038764/webrev.00/
for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038764
Just a minor HTML markup fix (few 'trimming empty ' warnings fixed).
Probably the code affected is an upstream.
Regards,
Alexa
Thanks!
Regards,
Alexander
On 17.04.2015 19:33, huizhe wang wrote:
Hi Alexander,
That fixed the issue in the existing Javadoc. The JAXP changes look
good now.
Thanks for doing this!
Best,
Joe
On 4/17/2015 4:36 AM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello Joe,
> [jw] as I mentioned, is nee
/src/java.activation/share/classes/javax/activation/MimetypesFileTypeMap.java.udiff.html
Hopefully that's all for this bug...
Thanks,
Alexander
On 16.04.2015 15:48, alexander stepanov wrote:
Please note also that a couple of new files were touched:
http://cr.openjdk.java.ne
Hello Lance,
Thanks.
Regards,
Alexander
On 16.04.2015 19:58, Lance Andersen wrote:
Hi Alexander,
These seem to be OK
Best
Lance
On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:07 AM, alexander stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:
I'm sorry, two extra files
break;
* }
- *
+ * }
[jw] as I mentioned, is needed for the code snippet.
BTW, have you compiled and verified the Javadoc after the changes?
Thanks,
Joe
On 4/16/2015 7:07 AM, alexander stepanov wrote:
I'm sorry, two extra files touched -
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan
ation/MimetypesFileTypeMap.java.udiff.html
Hopefully that's all for this bug...
Thanks,
Alexander
On 16.04.2015 15:48, alexander stepanov wrote:
Please note also that a couple of new files were touched:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8077332/webrev.01/jaxws/src/java.annotations.co
jaxws/src/java.annotations.common/share/classes/javax/annotation/PreDestroy.java.udiff.html>
On 15.04.2015 19:12, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello Joe,
The copyright changes were reverted.
Please review the updated fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8077332/webrev.01/
("" replaced w
, huizhe wang wrote:
On 4/13/2015 4:42 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 13/04/2015 12:22, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello Joe,
Thank you for the notes;
> Copyright year shall not be changed.
That seems to be a bit controversial point; sometimes (while
cleaning docs) I was asked to do that,
ree serialization escapes & and < (and
+ * Normally, result tree serialization escapes & and < (and
*(JW) use @literal for "&" as well.*
- * Use a DOM node to create a new output target with the specified System
ID.
+ * Use a DOM node to cr
Thanks!
On 10.04.2015 20:07, Sean Mullan wrote:
On 04/10/2015 12:01 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 10/04/2015 16:50, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8077332/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077332
Hello Alan,
Thank you.
Regards,
Alexander
On 10.04.2015 19:01, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 10/04/2015 16:50, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8077332/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077332
Some HTML
Thanks!
On 07.04.2015 20:13, Roger Riggs wrote:
Thanks, looks fine.
Roger
On 4/7/2015 1:00 PM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello Roger,
Thank you for the notes, fixed:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8039440/webrev.01/src/java.corba/share/classes/org/omg/CORBA/portable
Thanks!
On 07.04.2015 20:48, Lance Andersen wrote:
Hi Alexander,
InTypeCode.java you might want to use {@code} vs so that you do
not have to use > <
Otherwise it is OK
Best
Lance
On Apr 7, 2015, at 1:00 PM, alexander stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>>
, Roger
On 4/7/2015 10:40 AM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
I'm not if the mail list is correct, but could anyone please review
the following fix?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8039440/webrev.01/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039440
Just an HTML markup f
Thanks!
On 07.04.2015 17:45, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
I'm not sure either but the fix looks OK to me.
-yan
On 04/07/2015 05:40 PM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
I'm not if the mail list is correct, but could anyone please review the
following fix?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net
Hello,
I'm not if the mail list is correct, but could anyone please review the
following fix?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8039440/webrev.01/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039440
Just an HTML markup fix for CORBA.
Thanks,
Alexander
Hello Lance,
oh yes, thanks!
Regards,
Alexander
On 30.04.2014 14:39, Lance Andersen wrote:
On Apr 30, 2014, at 4:23 AM, alexander stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Sorry, could please anybody else review the changes? We need at least
two positive response
Sorry, could please anybody else review the changes? We need at least
two positive responses to push the changes.
Thanks,
Alexander
On 18.04.2014 23:47, Lance Andersen wrote:
looks fine
On Apr 18, 2014, at 10:04 AM, alexander stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>&
thanks!
On 18.04.2014 23:47, Lance Andersen wrote:
looks fine
On Apr 18, 2014, at 10:04 AM, alexander stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-802945
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029451
Webrev corresponding:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/JDK-8029451/webrev.00/
Just a minor cleanup of javadoc to avoid tidy warnings; no other code
affected.
Thanks.
Regards,
Alexan
thanks!
On 15.04.2014 17:24, Lance Andersen wrote:
looks ok
On Apr 15, 2014, at 9:11 AM, alexander stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Sorry, the webrev was updated to include one other minor change in
javax/script/ScriptEngineFactory.java to avoid creation of
Sorry, the webrev was updated to include one other minor change in
javax/script/ScriptEngineFactory.java to avoid creation of separate
review request:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8030709/webrev.01/
Regards,
Alexander
On 10.04.2014 12:24, alexander stepanov wrote:
> BigInteger.java f
> BigInteger.java from java.lang was also touched.
sorry, from java.math
On 10.04.2014 12:23, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030709
Webrev corresponding:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8030
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030709
Webrev corresponding:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8030709/webrev.00/
Just a minor cleanup of javadoc to avoid tidy warnings; no other code
affected.
BigInteger.java from java.la
Engineering
1 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 9, 2014, at 5:45 AM, alexander stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the follo
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039488
Webrev corresponding:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8039488/webrev.00/
Just a minor cleanup of javadoc to avoid tidy warnings; no other code
affected.
Thanks.
Regards,
Alexander
Thanks; the line in net-properties.html was splitted.
Regards,
Alexander
On 04.04.2014 19:25, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 04/04/2014 12:53, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello Lance,
Thank you for the note; the summaries were removed, please see the
updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan
etwork Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 4, 2014, at 4:55 AM, alexander stepanov
<mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039172
Webrev corresponding:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8039172/webrev.00/
Just a minor cleanup of javadoc to avoid tidy warnings; no other code
affected.
Thanks.
Regards,
Alexander
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039041
Webrev corresponding:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8039041/webrev.00/
Just a minor cleanup of javadoc to avoid tidy warnings; no other code
affected.
Thanks.
Regards,
Alexander
wrote:
I think you are looking for jmx-dev so forwarding to that list.
On 01/04/2014 13:51, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038795
Webrev corresponding:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8038795/
Thanks!
On 01.04.2014 16:57, Alan Bateman wrote:
I think you are looking for jmx-dev so forwarding to that list.
On 01/04/2014 13:51, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038795
Webrev
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038795
Webrev corresponding:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8038795/webrev.00/
Just a minor cleanup of javadoc to avoid tidy warnings; no other code
affected.
Thanks.
Regards,
Alexander
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
