v/c60cf8acabb2
>
> Going further and removing the String allocation entirely (returning "")
> might have unexpected side-effects for some code expecting a new, distinct
> object. Any potential benefit might also be eaten up by increased byte
> code,
> more branches etc.
Hi,
There are 2 things I do not understand about how substring works, hopefully
someone can shed some light on it.
1. When you call substring and you provide the string's length as
beginIndex, why does it return an empty string instead of throwing an
exception? You are effectively indexing outsid
Hi Martin,
Nice catches on the cleanup!
By the way, can you tell me why you used named loops in your code? Isn't it
considered bad practice as it is almost like a goto statement? Couldn't we
refactor it in a way that we do not use named loops?
Also, if there is a for loop that has no start state
rgetCount,
> int fromIndex) {
>
> It does look like we can tighten the code up a little...
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Zoltan Sziladi
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the info.
>> So that basically means we have 2 implementations of indexOf curren
function, or (c) some other JVM
> that doesn't intrinsify this method (or any method).
>
> People don't usually disable intrinsics; if they do, it's because they hit
> some JIT bug and may disable it.
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Zoltan Sziladi
> wrote:
>
he indexOf function not
intrinsified? When do people usually disable intrinsification?
Sorry if these are newbie questions, I'm new to this part of Java.
Regards,
Zoltan
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/01/15 18:59, Zoltan Sziladi wrote:
>
>
Hi,
This discussion was a long time ago, I was just reading through it to check
again what was the last state of the discussion about the String.indexOf.
There is one part which I still do not understand, hopefully someone could
shed some light on it. A few emails ago Martin mentioned
"Hotspot se
to implement efficiently.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Zoltan Sziladi wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am new to this mailing list so please forgive me if this has been
>> discussed before.
>>
>> I was looking at the implementation of String.inde
Hi,
I am new to this mailing list so please forgive me if this has been
discussed before.
I was looking at the implementation of String.indexOf and I see that
it uses the O(n^2) naive implementation. I have been trying to find
out why it does not use some kind of a modern, sophisticated O(n)
algo
