> From: Alan Bateman
> To: Andrew Guibert
> Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Date: 05/12/2017 04:02 AM
> Subject: Re: Proposal:
> javax.naming.spi.NamingManager.clearInitialContextFactoryBuilder()
>
> On 11/05/2017 22:25, Andrew Guibert wrote:
> Alan, could you p
lready set");
<
Alan Bateman wrote on 05/10/2017 07:32:47 AM:
> From: Alan Bateman
> To: Andrew Guibert , core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Date: 05/10/2017 07:32 AM
> Subject: Re: Proposal:
> javax.naming.spi.NamingManager.clearInitialContextFactoryBuilder()
>
>
> From: Alan Bateman
> To: Andrew Guibert , core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Date: 05/10/2017 07:32 AM
> Subject: Re: Proposal:
> javax.naming.spi.NamingManager.clearInitialContextFactoryBuilder()
>
> On 08/05/2017 23:27, Andrew Guibert wrote:
>
> > :
> >
>
Hi all,
I've been cleaning up code that I work on to be Java 9 compatible, but have
ran into a blocker due to limitations of the Naming API. I could work
around the blocker with an --add-opens, but I'd rather find a proper
solution.
*** Background
Currently the javax.naming.spi.NamingManager a
