> On 25 Sep 2015, at 11:58, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please review this change to add a method Optional.or that allows one to
> better compose optionals:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/jdk9/JDK-8080418-optional-or/webrev/
>
> I also took the opportunity to clear up the JavaDo
Hi all,
what would it take to get JDK-5071718 into 9?
I thought about something like this;
/**
Creates a new byte buffer whose content is a shared subsequence of this
buffer's content.
The content of the new buffer will start at the given position. The
capacity and limit of the new buffer will
Hi Peter,
> Am 25.09.2015 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Levart :
>> One question about MethodType: would you mind doing something about the
>> naming of the newly introduced fromDescriptor() method? Its name does not
>> suggest in any way that it chooses the class loader differently. The name is
>> su
Hello!
>> Quite interesting and long awaited features (at least according to
>> StackOverflow questions).
PS> All of them? or just the first?
The first one is definitely the most requested feature. However,
additional methods for primitive optionals were requested at least
twice:
http://stackove
