Re: Embedded HTTP server

Juha Lindfors wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 7:03 PM, David M. Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: If not... does anyone besides me think this is a good idea? I think it would be a great idea... the only reason I've shied away from using the current embedded

Re: Embedded HTTP server

On 05/27/2008 01:29 PM, Juha Lindfors wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 7:03 PM, David M. Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If not... does anyone besides me think this is a good idea? I think it would be a great idea... the only reason I've shied away from using the current embedded one is its

Re: Embedded HTTP server

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 7:03 PM, David M. Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If not... does anyone besides me think this is a good idea? > I think it would be a great idea... the only reason I've shied away from using the current embedded one is its unclear status in the com.sun.* package. --

Re: more TreeMap questions (descendingMap, headMap and tailMap)

If that's the definition given to "restricted range", I think there is some inconsistencies in the behavior of TreeMap. If you play around with some of descendingMap(), subMap(), headMap() and tailMap() variations such as those in the example program in my original e-mail, I think you'll see t

Embedded HTTP server

Is there an effort underway to produce a JSR for adding an embedded HTTP server (like the one currently in OpenJDK under the com.sun.net.httpserver) to the JDK (under e.g. javax.net.httpserver or similar)? If not... does anyone besides me think this is a good idea? - DML